|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: janpajakjanpajak Date: Apr 15, 2008 23:33
A rather extraordinary class of scientific evidence for the existence
of God, is the difference between attributes of substances or objects
which in past were called "holy", and attributes of other similar
substances or objects which were NOT considered to be holy. For
example, let us consider attributes of such "holy" substances and
objects, as: (1) "daily bread" (by the Christian religion considered
to be a representation of the body of Christ), (2) "coconuts", (3)
"drinking water" (by first Christians used for christening, while by
pagans utilised in water dowsing), (4) "red wine" (considered to
represent the blood of Jesus). If one compares their attributes with
attributes of other very similar substances or objects, e.g. with
attributes of: (1n) white bread or buns, (2n) fruits of tropical
durian, (3n) undrinkable water, (4n) white wine, then outcomes of this
comparison become very meaningful. Namely, it then turns out that
everything that in past was described as "holy" actually displays
attributes which are beneficial to people at many levels, and which do
NOT introduce any side effects. In turn everything that was NOT
considered holy shows also various attributes that are undesirable for
humans - in spite that in almost every aspect it is similar to a
related holy substance or object. For example, in spite that the ...
|
| Show full article (12.74Kb) |
|
| | 36 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Sanity's Little HelperSanity's Little Helper Date: Apr 16, 2008 04:00
> A rather extraordinary class of scientific evidence for the existence
> of God, is
You'll be convinced by this:
http://www.lancs.ac.uk/ug/buxton/
--
David Silverman
aa #2208
Defender of Civilisation
Lord Mayor of Dis
Lawful copyright holder of the term "Earthquack".
Not authentic without this signature.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Robert WeldonRobert Weldon Date: Apr 16, 2008 09:00
>
-usual janpak crap snipped
Why do you insist on torturing poor defenseless electrons like that?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Tokay Pino GrisTokay Pino Gris Date: Apr 16, 2008 09:23
janpajak@ gmail.com wrote:
Basically Bullshit, but I will take it apart...
> A rather extraordinary class of scientific evidence for the existence
> of God, is the difference between attributes of substances or objects
> which in past were called "holy", and attributes of other...
|
| Show full article (4.01Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Tokay Pino GrisTokay Pino Gris Date: Apr 16, 2008 09:36
> A rather extraordinary class of scientific evidence for the existence
> of God, is the difference between attributes of substances or objects
> which in past were called "holy", and attributes of other similar
> substances or objects which were NOT considered to be holy.
I just found another error.
How exactly is this "scientific evidence for the existence of god"?
I mean, it is not such a bad idea NOT to eat pigs if you have no way to
ensure that there are no trichines in them.
Also, praying five times a day in the way muslims do (have you SEEN
them? That is situps! Thats sports!)
Washing before prayer? Hey, if the way to get people to clean themselves
is to tell them they have to wash before prayer....
Hey, ever heard of the healing hands of monarchs in the dark ages?
There IS a grain of truth in there!
Before people were brought in front of the king to be touched, they were
quite thoroughly CLEANED! Hey, and an infected wound... if you clean it?
You know what? It gets better!
|
| Show full article (1.89Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: HatterHatter Date: Apr 16, 2008 14:11
On Apr 16, 2:33Â am, janpa...@ gmail.com wrote:
> A rather extraordinary class of scientific evidence for the existence
> of God, is the difference between attributes of substances or objects
> which in past were called "holy", and attributes of other similar
> substances or objects which were NOT considered to be holy.
The difference is pure bullshitonium.
Hatter
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: admanadman Date: Apr 16, 2008 14:31
gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6f1e3f80-0e7e-419c-864d-e4030a3a7656@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
What a fascinating post. But of course the atheist will scoff, choke, and
ridicule.
|A rather extraordinary class of scientific evidence for the existence
| of God, is the difference between attributes of substances or objects
| which in past were called "holy", and attributes of other...
|
| Show full article (13.39Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: panamfloydpanamfloyd Date: Apr 16, 2008 14:36
On Apr 16, 2:33Â am, janpa...@ gmail.com wrote:
> A rather extraordinary class of scientific evidence for the existence
> of God, is the difference between attributes of substances or objects
> which in past were called "holy", and attributes of other similar
> substances or objects which were NOT considered to be holy. For
> example, let us consider attributes of such "holy" substances and
> objects, as:
|
| Show full article (1.13Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: panamfloydpanamfloyd Date: Apr 16, 2008 14:40
On Apr 16, 5:31Â pm, "adman" <72...@hottmail.et> wrote:
> gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6f1e3f80-0e7e-419c-864d-e4030a3a7656@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
> What a fascinating post. But of course the atheist will scoff, choke, and
> ridicule.
Aw, wassamatta, my lil' missionary? Magic spells still not working?
Maybe you should go home and practice. Come back in about thirty
years.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Preventer of WorkPreventer of Work Date: Apr 16, 2008 17:36
adman wrote:
> gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6f1e3f80-0e7e-419c-864d-e4030a3a7656@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> What a fascinating post. But of course the atheist will scoff, choke, and
> ridicule.
>
We would only choke if we swallowed that load of horse pucky.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|