Re: Souped Up Velikosky
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Souped Up Velikosky         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Dan Drake
Date: Sep 4, 2008 14:20

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:46:33 UTC, "Mike Schilling"
hotmail.com> wrote:
> Bill Snyder wrote:
>> On 03 Sep 2008 22:33:13 GMT, "Dan Drake" dandrake.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 20:47:25 UTC, "Mike Schilling"
>>> hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> William Hyde wrote:
>>>>> " Although he had been planning to write his own big book about
>>>>> "the construction of the universe," he judged the time too
>>>>> dangerous. He put off the project for a decade, until after his
>>>>> most powerful admirer, Maffeo Cardinal Barberini, was elected
>>>>> Pope
>>>>> Urban VIII. Then Galileo discussed his book idea with the new
>>>>> pope
>>>>> and got tacit permission to proceed - provided he would present
>>>>> the two arguments equally, and not promote one side over the
>>>>> other."
>>>>>
>>>>> Though how one can "fairly" promote an incorrect theory is a
>>>>> question I cannot answer.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You teach the controversy.
>>>
>>> He did (I mean, Galileo). Read what he said. It's in print in
>>> English at this very moment.
>>> The accusation was, and is, that he didn't teach it well enough.
>>> Perhaps after you've looked through the book, you could help us
>>> understand what a better treatment would have been like.
>>
>> I believe Mike is engaging in a bit of sarcasm related to a
>> certain Governor-and-VP-candidate's suggested approach to the
>> teaching of evolution.
>
> Not just her; it's a standard Republican line.

Sure is. Trouble is, when one spends time in talk.origins, one sees it
used in all seriousness all too often.

My apologies, since I might have recognized your name and remembered which
side you're on!

no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!