> Michael Stemper walkabout.empros.com> wrote:
>>John writes:
>>>Jerry Kraus wrote:
>>>> Given that I don't really believe in Einstein either, I don't think
>>>> I'll bother, thanks. Â Â I see I'm dealing with anti-science, science
>>>> types. Â If it makes sense, ignore it. Â If it's nonsense, it must be
>>>> true. Â I gather you also are a fervent believer in Global Warming?
>
>>>Your position is perfectly situated in the null set: nonsense.
>
>>He probably doesn't believe in set theory, either.
>
> Standard extensions or nonstandard?
>
> Dave "six contradictory things before breakfast" DeLaney
> --
> \/David DeLaney posting from d...@
vic.com "It's not the pot that     grows the flower
> It's not the clock that slows the hour  The definition's plain for anyone to see
> Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE Â Â Â Â HAPPYNET VRbeable
Actually, I do believe in set theory. Did you know it was deveoped in
the third century B.C. in China? The examples in the White Horse
Dialogue effectively outline the basics of set theory and predicate
calculus over 2,000 years before they were supposedly developed.
http://faculty.vassar.edu/brvannor/Reader/whitehorse.html