Re: Souped Up Velikosky
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Souped Up Velikosky         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Jerry Kraus
Date: Aug 29, 2008 11:43

On Aug 29, 1:17 pm, thro...@sheol.org (Wayne Throop) wrote:
> : Jerry Kraus yahoo.com>
> : Galileo was effectively arguing that there was no
> : God.  He didn't realize that, but that is because he had no idea
> : whatsoever what he was actually doing.  An Idiot-Savant.  Like so many
> : scientists.
>
> Oh yeah.  Horrible.  Real wrath-of-God type stuff.
> Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies.  Rivers and seas boiling.
> Forty years of darkness.  Earthquakes, volcanoes, the dead rising from
> the grave.  Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria.
> Better lock up Galileo before it's too late.
>
> And of course, all the people who think Galileo was perfectly correct in
> his arguments, and yet think there is a God and that Galileo's arguments
> don't deny it, are all raving loons.  And clearly evil scientists used
> mysterious mind-control rays to get the Church to say they made a mistake
> with Galileo.
>
> Wayne Throop   thro...@sheol.org  http://sheol.org/throopw

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0801299.htm

Jesuit Father Sabino Maffeo, the Vatican Observatory's vice director
for administration, told CNS that Galileo ran into trouble with the
Holy Office because he did not have proof for his claims.

"Not having proof ... (the Holy Office) was forced to hold on to the
centuries-old concept" that saw Earth as the center of the cosmos, he
said.

If he had had proof, which did not come for another 100 years with
discoveries made by Isaac Newton, Galileo's fate could have been much
different, Father Maffeo said. He added that Italian Cardinal Robert
Bellarmine, who was part of the 17th-century Vatican commission that
admonished Galileo not to hold or defend the Copernican theory, had
told Galileo "the day in which you bring a demonstration then we will
have to look at how sacred Scripture gets interpreted differently, but
as long as there is no proof, we will continue to interpret
(Scripture) literally as we have all along."
1 Comment
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!