|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Date: Aug 24, 2007 07:25
Because it's okay to molest little kids as long as Jesus forgives you
afterwards.
Yep, that vaunted Christian moral superiority
http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article/0,,2155269,00.html
A predatory paedophile walked free from court yesterday after
admitting a string of sex attacks on children, including an
18-month-old baby.
Michael Porter, 38, used his trusted position as a prominent Jehovah's
Witness to prey on youngsters, many of them children of members of the
church.
He pleaded guilty to 24 counts of indecent assault and gross indecency
over 15 years. But at Bristol crown court Judge Tom Crowther handed
him a three-year community rehabilitation order after hearing he had
undergone therapy.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
|
| Show full article (0.91Kb) |
|
| | 20 Comments |
|
  |
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Aug 24, 2007 20:56
On Aug 24, 7:25 am, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" mail.com>
wrote:
> Because it's okay to molest little kids as long as Jesus forgives you
> afterwards.
>
But Catholics are getting busted all the time for those crimes and
they are religious people that believe that Jesus forgives them. Are
you refering to that particular case or talking about all christians?
Be more clear.
> Yep, that vaunted Christian moral superiority
>
That seems to imply that only Christians can be pedophiles.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Al KleinAl Klein Date: Aug 25, 2007 20:13
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:56:59 -0700, Immortalist
yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Aug 24, 7:25 am, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" mail.com>
>wrote:
>> Because it's okay to molest little kids as long as Jesus forgives you
>> afterwards.
>>
>
>But Catholics are getting busted all the time for those crimes and
>they are religious people that believe that Jesus forgives them.
And they believe that they did no wrong.
>> Yep, that vaunted Christian moral superiority
>That seems to imply that only Christians can be pedophiles.
No, it STATES that, regardless of their claim that being a Christian
means that you're more moral than an atheist, it doesn't.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Date: Aug 25, 2007 21:33
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:56:59 -0700, Immortalist
yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Aug 24, 7:25 am, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" mail.com>
>wrote:
>> Because it's okay to molest little kids as long as Jesus forgives you
>> afterwards.
>>
>
>But Catholics are getting busted all the time for those crimes and
>they are religious people that believe that Jesus forgives them. Are
>you refering to that particular case or talking about all christians?
>Be more clear.
>
>> Yep, that vaunted Christian moral superiority
>>
>
>That seems to imply that only Christians can be pedophiles.
That seems to imply that you think Christians should be allowed molest
children.
|
| Show full article (0.88Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Aug 25, 2007 23:04
On Aug 26, 12:13 pm, Al Klein wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:56:59 -0700, Immortalist
>
> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>On Aug 24, 7:25 am, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" mail.com>
>>wrote:
>>> Because it's okay to molest little kids as long as Jesus forgives you
>>> afterwards.
>
>>But Catholics are getting busted all the time for those crimes and
>>they are religious people that believe that Jesus forgives them.
>
> And they believe that they did no wrong.
Obviously not until the mongrels have been caught and they want
society to sacrifice justice for mercy, the scourge of mankind.
MG
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Jon SchildJon Schild Date: Aug 26, 2007 08:03
Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:56:59 -0700, Immortalist
> yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On Aug 24, 7:25 am, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" mail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Because it's okay to molest little kids as long as Jesus forgives you
>>>afterwards.
>>>
>>
>>But Catholics are getting busted all the time for those crimes and
>>they are religious people that believe that Jesus forgives them. Are
>>you refering to that particular case or talking about all christians?
>>Be more clear.
>>
>>
>>>Yep, that vaunted Christian moral superiority
>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.52Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Aug 26, 2007 09:41
On Aug 25, 8:13 pm, Al Klein wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:56:59 -0700, Immortalist
>
> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>On Aug 24, 7:25 am, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" mail.com>
>>wrote:
>>> Because it's okay to molest little kids as long as Jesus forgives you
>>> afterwards.
>
>>But Catholics are getting busted all the time for those crimes and
>>they are religious people that believe that Jesus forgives them.
>
> And they believe that they did no wrong.
>
>>> Yep, that vaunted Christian moral superiority
>>That seems to imply that only Christians can be pedophiles.
>
> No, it STATES that, regardless of their claim that being a Christian
> means that you're more moral than an atheist, it doesn't.
|
| Show full article (0.81Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Kenneth DoyleKenneth Doyle Date: Aug 26, 2007 17:26
Howard Brazee brazee.net> wrote in
news:ii54d39itat219gjislac7hhsfk3fpe3qp@4ax.com:
>>If by that you think that it
>>proves anything about other Christians being pedophiles or approving
>>pedophilia, you are making a serious error in logic.
>
> Agreed. Christians don't appear to be significantly more or less
> prone to such wrongs as non-Christians. Pointing to failings of
> either population says nothing of the population as a whole.
>
So when Jesus reportedly said, "You will know them by their fruits", he was
making a serious error in logic?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Al KleinAl Klein Date: Aug 26, 2007 17:56
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:41:24 -0700, Immortalist
yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Aug 25, 8:13 pm, Al Klein wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:56:59 -0700, Immortalist
>>
>> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>On Aug 24, 7:25 am, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
|
| Show full article (0.95Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Howard BrazeeHoward Brazee Date: Aug 26, 2007 18:51
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:26:11 GMT, Kenneth Doyle notmail.com>
wrote:
>> Agreed. Christians don't appear to be significantly more or less
>> prone to such wrongs as non-Christians. Pointing to failings of
>> either population says nothing of the population as a whole.
>>
>
>So when Jesus reportedly said, "You will know them by their fruits", he was
>making a serious error in logic?
Who was the "them" he was referring to? A population?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|