Author: turtoniturtoni Date: Sep 18, 2008 16:21
On Sep 18, 12:08Â pm, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:> Beating a dead horse?
>
> In the question "why is there something instead of nothing", an answer
> can be found, given the same reasoning, with the question, "Why is there
> any one thing instead of another one thing"? Why, for instance, is there
> a lake were a lake exists instead of a car dealership, or a tree?
>
> If this question does not directly mirror the reasoning behind the
> something/nothing question, it is the something/nothing reasoning that is
> invalid. If it does, the answer becomes clearer.
All of the questions and answers are the constructions of language.
For example; there is no "nothing".
Perhaps when we die there is "nothing" and that would mean "nothing".
| 
