> DEAR PRESIDENT AHMADINEJAD: I have read with great interest your
> interview with the German magazine Der Spiegel and your open letter
> to President George W. Bush. I am an American of European descent
> who wishes to prevent war between our two countries. I also hope-
> and work-for the self-determination of my own people; and I
> believe that all the peoples who suffer under Jewish/Zionist
> domination should stand together for one another's freedom.
> I am the publisher of "Inside the 'Axis of Evil'" and I was recently
> interviewed by your country's Mehr News Agency. I hope you will find
> my thoughts helpful and illuminating in the causes of peace and
> freedom.
> The most important fact you must understand, as the forces of war
> and hate increasingly target your country, is the near-total control
> of the media of news and entertainment in the West-and especially
> in America-by the Jewish minority. Even though Jews constitute a
> tiny fraction-around 2 per cent.-of the population of the
> U.S., they dominate the press, the television networks, the radio
> networks, and the production and distribution of motion pictures.
> I am the author of the research report Who Rules America?, which
> documents this control in detail. My report begins with a survey of
> the anti-European racial bias of the American media, which may seem
> irrelevant to you; but I assure you it is not: Just as the Jews
> flooded Palestine with non-Palestinians, they are also flooding
> America and Europe with non-Europeans to weaken and divide the
> people and make them easier to rule. In any case, I urge you to read
> my entire report, since after that brief introduction I show, in
> detail, absolute proof of the Jewish control of "American" mass
> media. It is this control which ought to be of even more concern to
> you than who becomes the next President of the United States or
> which party nominally controls the U.S. Congress.
>
> Because the major media in America are controlled by Zionist Jews-
> Jewish supremacists-it is almost impossible for anti-Zionist or
> even non-Zionist politicians to be elected here, making a sham of
> our so-called democracy. If a candidate emerges who opposes the
> Jewish/Zionist agenda, he is relentlessly attacked by the media, who
> work day and night to slander him and blacken his reputation, so
> that he becomes unelectable.
> The leading politicians of both parties are well aware of this
> Zionist control, and many privately deplore it: Witness Richard
> Nixon's private remarks to Christian leader Billy Graham on the
> destructive effects of Jewish power, even though in public he did
> almost everything the Jews wanted; witness Vice President Spiro
> Agnew's opposition to Zionism evident in private remarks and in his
> novel The Canfield Decision, published only after he left office;
> witness the statements of Jimmy Carter (that to oppose Israel is
> "political suicide") and of Senator Ernest Hollings (that "You can't
> have an Israel policy other than what AIPAC gives you....") only
> after they had decided they were no longer going to run for
> political office. Many other political leaders know that Jewish
> supremacists control our media and thereby control our foreign
> policy-but they do not have the courage to say so because of that
> very media control.
>
> This media control has even deformed religion in the United States:
> The Christian Zionist organizations, which hardly existed a few
> decades ago, have been given tremendous access to the television
> airwaves and have, as a consequence, become a dominant force in
> American Christianity. They form a very large part of what is called
> the Religious Right in this country, and are largely responsible for
> George Bush's political success. Even as many old-line Christian
> denominations, like the Presbyterians, wake up to the inhuman,
> genocidal agenda of Zionism, churches that have come under the sway
> of Christian Zionism teach their flocks that "Israel can do no
> wrong" and "Israel fulfills prophecy" et cetera-and thereby feed
> the bloodlust of the Zionist neocons.
> ]
> As you point out in your letter and your interview, the Jewish
> Holocaust story is being used as a political tool to extract
> compliance-and billions of dollars-from non-Jews. I deeply
> appreciate your bringing the work of the revisionist historians, who
> tell us that not every Jewish assertion about World War II is true,
> to the attention of millions upon millions of people who otherwise
> would never have heard of it.
>
> May I draw your attention to a particularly pernicious Jewish use of
> the tragedy of World War II? I'm referring to the demonization, as
> "new Hitlers," of men-and nations-who want to have a
> government not under the supervision of Zionist Jews.
> In February, the Chairman of the Council of Jews in France said in
> Paris: "The Iranian President's assertions do not rank behind
> Hitler's Mein Kampf."
> Paul Spiegel, President of the Central Council of Jews in Germany,
> was quoted in Die Welt saying that your statements on Israel and
> Jewish power "were the worst comment on this subject that he has
> ever heard of a statesman since Adolf Hitler."
> At the White House, according to Jewish writer Seymour Hersh in The
> New Yorker magazine, you are routinely referred to as "Hitler."
>
> All this indicates a strong desire for war on the part of those who
> have already made it happen twice-in Afghanistan and Iraq-in
> just the past few years. Slobodan Milosevic was called a new Hitler
> because he resisted internationalist control of his country. The
> result was the NATO war against Yugoslavia. Saddam Hussein was
> called a new Hitler when he quit taking orders from Washington. What
> followed was the war on, and occupation of, Iraq.
> And now you are being portrayed by the Jewish establishment as a
> "new Hitler." At the latest AIPAC conference, which was attended by
> many of the most powerful Jews and powerful politicians in America,
> the Ahmadinejad-as-Hitler image was far more than a metaphor or an
> implication-it was a larger-than-life in-your-face assertion.
> Here's a description of the event by a Jewish student who was there,
> Alice Ollstein, as published in the Jewish Journal of Greater Los
> Angeles:
>
> 'The speakers and "informational" videos left no gray area, no
> place for dialog or debate, and certainly no place for dissent. I
> especially squirmed at the parallels AIPAC drew between Iranian
> President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hitler. To the tune of more
> dramatic classical music, the six enormous screens flashed back and
> forth between Hitler giving anti-Jew speeches and Ahmadinejad giving
> anti-Israel speeches. The famous post-Holocaust mantra "Never Again"
> popped up several times. Everything was geared toward persuading the
> audience that another Holocaust is evident ... unless we get them
> first.'
>
> And since nearly all Jews and a very large number of non-Jews in the
> West have been programmed by the media to turn off all reason and
> begin salivating for blood as soon as the name "Hitler" is invoked,
> facts will not matter. Whatever "crimes" the Hitler-figure is
> accused of will become real and he will become guilty. If the
> Hitler-figure obeys every law and every rule, it will not matter. A
> good example of this is your country's desire to develop nuclear
> energy. As journalist Jörg Pfuhl points out "Virtually none of the
> Western states recognize that uranium enrichment is absolutely
> legal. There is no restriction by contract or by the law of nations.
> Quite the contrary: Actually the Western countries would have the
> duty to assist Iran with these activities, according to the
> Non-Proliferation Treaty. As long as a state renounces the bomb it
> is eligible for technical support by the nuclear powers." (emphasis
> added) But you're "the new Hitler," so the facts don't matter.
>
> President Ahmadinejad, right now the American people are weary of
> war and even Bush's most ardent supporters don't think we've done
> well in occupying Iraq. A new war will be a very hard sell. But the
> Jewish supremacists who control the images on Americans' TV screens
> and magazine pages want to destroy you. They are masters of the hard
> sell. They are not men of honor and morality. They are not men of
> truth.
>
> They will use their intelligence agency assets to induce Muslims-
> preferably Muslims with an Iranian connection-to attack America
> again. They will "guide" a cell within your own government or
> military so that it commits some act to harm Americans. They will
> try to goad you-using some intolerable new act by Bush, which
> they will have caused-into yourself threatening or attacking the
> West. They will do any combination of the above, or something
> equivalent that no one can anticipate. They will do literally
> anything to start a war between our countries. You must guard
> vigilantly against such acts of deception and violence. You must
> give the warmongers no excuse.
>
> There are signs of hope in this country-hope that the star of the
> Jewish supremacists who rule us is now descending.
> In the American state of Alabama, a man who openly questioned Jewish
> power in this country-a man who called for the shutdown and
> prosecution of a powerful Zionist-linked censorship group-was
> very nearly nominated for the post of State Attorney General. Larry
> Darby, who spoke at a recent meeting of my organization, National
> Vanguard, was able to garner 44%% of the Democratic primary vote,
> carrying many parts of the state-despite the fact that the
> Jewish-dominated party bosses opposed him with all their might.
>
> In the American state of Tennessee, a man named James Hart won the
> Republican primary for Congress-with 73 per cent. of the vote-
> while openly advocating for European-Americans and against the
> ferocious opposition of the Jewish-controlled media and Jewish
> supremacist organizations. Hart would doubtlessly have gone further
> had he not been sabotaged by the bosses of his own Republican party,
> who went so far as to have his name removed from the ballot.
> Newspapers-and we know who dominates publishing in this country -
> refused to run his advertisements, so many voters were prevented
> from even hearing about him.
>
> My organization operates a multimedia Web
site-V-News.org-
> which features news articles, radio programs, and videos in direct
> competition with the Jewish-controlled media. We operate with a very
> small but very talented staff, who are mostly volunteers. Even
> though we feature many original stories, and sometimes exclusive
> scoops, every day, the news search engine
news.google.com has
> refused to carry our stories ever since Jewish organizations
> complained about our presence in their index.
>
> Despite these limitations and attacks against us, our readership
> ratings are soaring and are now comparable to or higher than those
> of the Web sites of many major American media outlets such as the
> Tampa Tribune, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, and many others. Our
> readership ratings are routinely far in excess of those of Jewish
> supremacist groups like the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith
> and the World Jewish Congress. Our pages are read more than a
> million times every month.
>
> I say these things to you because I think that the Internet has
> provided a wedge for the truth to get out to the American people,
> and that my group and others, like Messrs. Darby and Hart, have
> shown millions of Americans that there is an alternative view. If we
> who believe in freedom from Jewish domination-we who believe in
> true self-determination-can continue to expand our media
> capabilities, then there is a chance that the Jewish media monopoly
> will be seriously challenged and significantly diminished. That, I
> believe, is the key to taking away their power to wipe out whole
> nations and start wars whenever they choose.
> That means more than just news sites and newspapers-it means
> movie studios and publishing houses; it means DVDs and music videos;
> it means bookstores and family centers. It means replacing the media
> and infrastructure of the Jewish supremacists at every level.
>
> Now, President Ahmadinejad, I am not suggesting that Iranians set up
> as media barons in Europe and the U.S. (though that would be better
> than the Jewish monopoly we have now). What I am suggesting is that
> all of us who believe in freedom and self-determination for our own
> peoples-all of us who want a government of our own not under
> Jewish/internationalist supervision-ought to make breaking the
> Jewish media monopoly one of our highest priorities. Whatever our
> differences on other issues, we ought to cooperate in every way
> possible to achieve that goal. For your part, I suggest a strong
> effort to reach out to anti-war Americans of all parties and
> affiliations, and making full use of the alternative media-the
> "blogosphere" which includes National Vanguard and many other
> outlets-that free-thinking Americans have created and which will,
> I am sure, be very useful to the cause of peace and understanding
> between our two peoples. Your grace in favoring these alternative
> media with "scoops" and interviews will also make these alternative
> media stronger.
> I have devoted my life to the freedom of my people-people of
> European descent-and I want you to understand that my desire for
> racial and cultural integrity for my people is not an attack on your
> people in any way. As my friend and colleague Dr. David Duke said
> when he visited Syria recently, surely the Muslim world can
> understand European and European-American nationalists' desire to
> have their own nations and to end the mass immigration which has
> been engineered by Jewish supremacists specifically to dilute and
> weaken us as a people.
> [
> You would not countenance open borders in Iran. You would not
> tolerate mass immigration of tens of millions of people culturally
> and racially distinct from you-Europeans or Chinese, for example
> -- whatever your high regard for those peoples. We have both seen
> what massive Jewish immigration did to Palestine in the last
> century. Something similar happened to America a few years earlier,
> which allowed the Jewish supremacists to make my country their power
> base. Without that power base, there would be no Israel today, and
> no conflict between the Muslim world and the West.
> The Jewish supremacists have a vision of the world as one nominally
> "democratic," but with multiple races and cultures within each
> country, and with their media always holding the balance of power
> over elections, so that no one people can have its own government
> and no leader can ever emerge to challenge their rule or the power
> of their money. They want a world in which no people is allowed to
> have its own leaders or its own government any more-except Jews,
> except Israel. All other nations, as they see it, must become
> "multi-ethnic" states, effectively ruled by their international
> capital and their international media.
> We who believe otherwise must prevent that world from coming into
> being. It will be a slave world, a world without freedom, a world
> without distinctive cultures, and world system from which no
> dissident or free thinker can escape.
> To that end, I hope you will think about National Vanguard's vision
> of an alternative world, a world which can be summed up simply in
> what I call the Maxim of Self-Determination: "Each people which
> considers itself to be a people should, to the maximum extent
> possible, live under its own government."
> In closing, let me reiterate my thanks for your time and for your
> frank, courageous, and truthful statements on some of the most
> important issues of our age, and let me repeat my earnest wish that
> our peoples will never make war on each other.
>
>
> "Special Victims Unit is NBC's sleazy, sex-crime spinoff of Law and
> Order.
>
> The April 4th, 2003, episode was about two brothers who went on a
> crime spree. They held up small groups of people with a single gun,
> forced them to strip and have sex with one another -- including
> homosexual sex -- and then shot them in the head. The victims were
> robbed of money, watches, jewelry, and their ATM cards. (They were
> forced to give their PIN numbers.) One couple was engaged, and the
> woman's engagement ring was stolen. In one crime, the victims' SUV was
> stolen. By my count, eleven people were killed, and two more were
> abducted. Moreover, it turned out that the older brother beat up his
> father, homosexually raped his younger brother, and tried to frame him
> so he would take the blame for both of them.
>
> Now this crime might remind VNN readers (and precious few others) of
> the Wichita Massacre of December 14, 2000, in which two brothers,
> Reginald and Jonathan Carr, held up five people with a single gun,
> including a couple who were planning to be married. They raped the
> women and forced their victims to have sex with one another, including
> homosexual sex. The Carrs then forced their victims to withdraw money
> from their ATMs. They stole money, watches, jewelry, the engagement
> ring, and a SUV. They then they drove their victims to an icy field,
> shot all five in the head, then ran over their bodies. Amazingly, one
> woman survived.
>
> There is no doubt that Special Victims Unit episode 86 is based on
> the Wichita Massacre. But there are two main differences between the
> Kansas and New York versions. First of all, in the TV show the
> criminals are far worse: they kill more people, and although one of
> them seems so pathetic he is almost sympathetic, the other is a
> monster who raped and framed his brother and beat his father. Second,
> in the Special Victims Unit episode, the criminals are two handsome,
> blue-eyed White men, whereas the Carr brothers were ugly, scary-
> looking Niggers.
>
> Why was the race of the killers changed to adapt the Wichita Massacre
> for nationwide broadcast on NBC? For the same reason that the Wichita
> Massacre was not given nationwide coverage on NBC or any other
> network: the killers were Black and the victims were White. Now, the
> networks did not spike the story because heinous Black-on-White crimes
> are so unusual that giving them national coverage would mislead people
> into thinking such crimes are common. That didn't stop the networks
> from giving national coverage to the killing of the Black James Byrd
> by Whites in Jasper, Texas. In fact, Black-on-White crime is far more
> common than White-on-Black crime, but this fact is consciously hidden
> from the populace by the television networks while they subject Whites
> to a never ending guilt trip for the comparatively rare crimes they
> commit against Blacks. This kind of propaganda may explain why the
> victims in Wichita went to their deaths like sheep.
>
> The sadistic and savage nature of both crimes indicates that the
> killers were motivated by more than just greed. In the case of the
> Wichita massacre, that motive was racial hatred of Whites. In the
> Special Victims Unit episode, the motive could not be racial, so it
> was ascribed to resentment against rich people.
>
> And why were the crimes of the fictional killers made so much worse?
> The main agenda of the writers was to exploit the Wichita Massacre
> while concealing the racial aspect. But they may have had a subsidiary
> agenda. Since they know that the internet makes it impossible for them
> to keep everyone ignorant of the Wichita Massacre, they may have
> decided to defuse its racial element and its shock value by showing
> that Whites can do the same sort of thing, but far worse.
>
> The Jewish agenda of the mass media systematically conceals Black
> criminality and morally intimidates well-meaning Whites from
> protecting themselves against it. This cultural atmosphere made the
> Wichita Massacre possible. The networks would not give national
> coverage to the real crime. But it was too lurid for the media Jews to
> leave alone. So they took the crime that their brethren helped create,
> scrubbed it of racial truths, and turned it into another piece of
> anti-White propaganda to help lull the victims of the next massacre to
> sleep.
>
> What town will the next massacre be named for? Will it be yours?"
>
> THE CAT LADY
>
> ------------------------
>
> Additional information on SVU and the men behind it:
>
> The series is filmed on location in New York City by Wolf Films in
> association with Universal Television and Studios USA. Its producers:
>
> Neal Baer - Executive Producer (cannot be ascertained if Baer is a
> jew,
> but Baer is a common jewish name; Baer is an MD as well as a writer;
> he was the MD-adviser behind E.R., and now SVU
>
> Dick Wolf - Executive Producer (a New York City Catholic who wrote
> "School Ties" (1992) about anti-jew bigotry at a prep school)
>
> Ted Kotcheff - Executive Producer (best friend of Canadian jew
> novelist Mordecai Richler; married to possible jewess named Marburg)
>
> Peter Jankowski - Executive Producer
>
> Dick Wolf - Creator (note that one of his co-producers on the Crime &
> Punishment production team, Bill Guttentag, made the "documentary"
> "
Hate.com" for HBO)
>
> The matrix of jews and jew-friendlies from which SVU emerges makes
> inconceivable the accurate depiction of interracial crime, and
> guarantees whites will be portrayed as uniquely vicious, violent,
> greedy and dangerous -- the opposite of the truth. Jew Ben Stein
> described the mentality at work in his book The View From Sunset
> Boulevard, a review of which you can read here.
>
> The company that produces SVU for NBC is Universal, whose president is
> Steve Rosenberg, the jew marketer behind Jerry Springer, Maury Povich,
> and Sally Jesse Raphael - jews all. Jerry Springer, if you haven't
> heard of him, is not merely the host of the sleaziest talk show in the
> history of the world, but an ex-mayor of Cincinnati famous for paying
> a prostitute with a city check.
>
>
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/vnn/showEssay.asp?essayID=1172
>
>
>
> "It is said that the Jews, at least the Ashkenazi Jews, have a
> higher average IQ than Whites, at least Whites as loosely defined
> by the designers of the IQ tests. [ <
http://tinyurl.com/ihhe> ]
> According to Professor Richard Lynn, writing in Personality and
> Individual Differences on April 2d, 2003, the average verbal IQ
> of American Jews is about 108, which, some people argue, might
> explain the disproportionate number of Jews in certain positions.
> [ <
http://tinyurl.com/ihif> ] For example, although Jews are only
> about 2 to 3%% of the U.S. population, they constitute 23%% of the
> wealthiest Americans, 30%% of the faculty at "elite" universities,
> 11%% of Nobel Physics prizes, 60%% of Yale graduate students, 60%%
> of "top Hollywood positions" (according to 60 Minutes), and 76%%
> of "most influential intellectuals" (according to Alan
> Dershowitz).
>
> It's in verbal IQ -- not mathematical or visuospatial ability --
> that Jews excel, and, when you consider that the fast-talking,
> quick-thinking sharpster or con man is almost a Jewish
> stereotype, then common experience confirms the data. [
> <
http://tinyurl.com/ihje> ] This would mean that the Jewish
> advantage would show itself mainly in areas like law, politics,
> journalism, media, advertising, public relations, and other
> fields in which verbal skills, persuasion, word-weaving, or
> illusion-weaving are especially valuable. And that's what the
> statistics indicate. Though Jews are over represented in physics
> and math, they are far more over represented in Hollywood and law.
> This is another case where our day-to-day experience perfectly
> matches the science, and is essentially undeniable.
>
> According to Professor Lynn, in the article cited above, we would
> expect that the Jewish population would produce highly
> intelligent individuals, with an IQ over 130, at a rate four
> times higher than that of Whites. Even if we put the Jewish
> percentage at 3%% of the total population, that would mean that we
> would expect that Jews would constitute some 12%% of
> high-achievers in the United States. But that isn't the case,
> especially in areas well-known to be dominated by Jews. Instead
> we see them at 76%% of "influential intellectuals," 60%% of
> Hollywood executives, and 30%% of "elite" college faculty. Why
> this wild over representation, far beyond what we'd expect based
> on the IQ scores? [ <
http://tinyurl.com/ihk2> ] Some have argued
> that Jewish families are far more concerned than White families
> about the academic and professional success of their offspring,
> and concentrate far more of their time and energy and money on
> making sure that their children succeed in school and go on to
> the best careers possible. Others point out that Jews have a far
> higher degree of group consciousness -- of racial identity --
> than Whites, and that this intense ethnic identity makes Jews
> willing and eager to put their group interests above other
> interests, even individual economic interests. Thus Jews are more
> willing to help their fellow Jews because they are Jews (which
> experience tells us they do in so many different ways that it
> boggles the mind) than Whites are willing to help their fellow
> Whites because they are Whites (which happens far too seldom, and
> which is socially unacceptable anyway -- even illegal -- in the
> insane social and "moral" system which crafty Jews and decadent
> Whites have imposed on us). So Jews will preferentially hire
> other Jews; Jews will openly organize themselves to advance
> Jewish interests; Jews will portray Jews as sympathetic
> characters in their entertainment media; Jews will show Jewish
> interests as morally right in their news media; and, most
> importantly in my view, Jews will demonize any who oppose Jewish
> interests or who promote White interests. All of these things
> have an effect on the Jewish success rate in various fields, and
> the last mentioned has a profound effect in making many Gentiles,
> many Whites, act to promote Jewish success and Jewish interests
> and also makes them, in many cases, act against their own
> individual interests and their own racial interests. In fact,
> Jewish influence has been paramount in constructing the 'liberal'
> moral paradigm of the 20th century, which in effect says that
> acting in the interest of White people and doing anything which
> tends to support our continued existence in the world -- whether
> opposing racial mixing or working for an exclusive living space
> for Whites -- is "racism" and of course "racism" is the ultimate
> in evil according to this Jewish-created "morality...'
>
> Kevin Alfred Strom
>
>
