Rod Speed wrote:
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>> John Fields
austininstruments.com> wrote>>>>>> Rod Speed
gmail.com> wrote>>>>>>> Dan Drake
dandrake.com> wrote>
>>>>>>> It isn't MY concept of perjury thats being discussed. Try a dictionary sometime.
>
>> There's very little evidence that you are capable of a discussion.
>
> Whereas you are absolutely perfect in that regard eh ?
I don't know about perfection, it's hard to grok what a perfect
discussion would refer to but I've demonstrated communication abilities
that you lack.
>>> I ACTUALLY rubbed his stupid nose in the FACT that what Galileo did to avoid
>>> getting burnt at the stake was nothing even remotely resembling anything like perjury.
>
>> Is that what you think happened? You really do need to have your meds checked.
>
> Wota stunningly original and skillful attempt at an insult.
Maybe that's your problem; you don't know what an insult is.
>> Have you tried hooked on phonics?
>
> Have you tried remedial english ? Obviously not.
It's got pictures, don't be so afraid.
>> It seemed to help my grandchildren with reading.
>
> Wont be long before they have give you the bums rush into the nursing home.
They already exceed your skills at civilized discussion and behavior so
there's no doubt they will have jobs and be very capable of something
other than boorish usenet behavior.
>> There is no evidence you are capable of a discussion.
>> What you do isn't "discussion" by any definition.
>
> Whereas you are absolutely perfect in that regard eh ?
I know you have some trouble keeping up, especially when you're
frustrated and anxious but should be able to find someone near you that
can help you with the concept of "discussion"
>>>> You resorted to juvenile, mindless, insults with
>>>> an attempt to sidestep the issue by acting stupid.
>
>>> You're lying, as always.
Thanks for the prompt proof!
>>>> Just for the record, The dictionary here simply states "To
>>>> deliberately testify falsely under oath"
>
>>> You need a better dictionary.
>
>> I'm sorry
>
> Liar.
>
>> I can't find a dictionary with pictures to describe "perjury."
>
> Wota stunningly original and skillful attempt at an insult.
>
>> Just for the fun of it, what do you think the definition of perjury is?
>
> Try a decent dictionary.
Again I thank you for the prompt and overwhelming evidence that you:
don't read well, don't understand "discussion", and feel some need to
embarrass yourself with juvenile silliness.
>>>> Also of note, your statement above could be taken
>>>> as saying you believe he was burnt at the stake.
>
>>> Only by fools that dont have a fucking clue. You qualify.
>
>>>> I'll grant even you with the knowledge that he wasn't
>
>>> It is clear from what else I have said in this thread that I know he wasnt, fuckwit.
>
>> Yet again you miss the point.
>
> Wota stunningly original line...
>
>> I admitted you knew better in the statement above, but now I'm
>> starting to get the feeling that maybe you really don't get it at all.
>
> Wota stunningly original and skillful attempt at an insult.
I had a parrot once that could repeat things, but it wasn't really a
very smart animal. Apparently I've scared you so badly that you see
everything as an attack. Above I was trying to grant you some
intelligence yet you seem to disagree. I'll have to defer to your
judgement on the matter.
>>>> and that you simply weren't as clear, or profane, as normal.
>
>>> And you get to like that or lump it or shove your opinion where the sun dont shine, as always.
If you could please let me know what I've done that would lead you to
think I am in any way interested or concerned about your postings, I'd
gladly clarify the matter. Truth be told I see you as usenet graffiti.
Nothing more than the acting out of people with such low self esteem
that they feel powerless and struggle to find some cowardly acts to
assert themselves.
>> Actually it takes so little to hurt your feelings
>
> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
You don't have to be afraid.
>> like zippy the pinhead. Actually zippy is much more imaginative and interesting.
>
> Wota stunningly original and skillful attempt at an insult.
You certainly have a knack for both missing the point and proving it at
the same time.
