Re: Sign of Genius
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Sign of Genius         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: John Fields
Date: Aug 24, 2008 12:56

On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:25:27 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:
>This one is even easier to call than the attempt to impress by
>claiming a profitable patent and then being too modest to post the
>patent number.

---
Wrong again.

It isn't modesty, its an attempt to rankle you by not letting you have
your way, and it seems to be working pretty well, since you just can't
seem to let go of it.

Same way with the LOL thing.
---
>> LOL,
>
>Well at least you aren't swearing. That reduces readership.

---
Fuck you, puke.
---
>> you certainly seem to be making quite a commotion over it!
>
>I hate to burst your bubble, but anyone can google "Bret Cahill" and
>find out his real interests.

---
That isn't the issue. The issue is that you can't seem to stop
ranting on and on, ad nauseam about typing 'LOL', and then you post:

"Only a complete idiot would give a rat's ass about a dunce typing
"LOL!"

Making it abundantly clear that since you do give much more than a
rat's ass about it you admit to being a complete idiot.

I don't expect you'll be able to see how the inference is drawn, which
adds more fuel to the fire.

Anyway, why would anyone want to check you out on Google when just
from your posts in the few newsgroups to which this thread is being
posted you come across as a thoroughly obnoxious ass?
---
>It's easy for anyone to document that the dunces spend more time
>on my threads than _I_ spend on my threads.

---
If they read you at all and think kindly of you it's probably because
they've found a kindred spirit in a pointy hat. "Birds of a feather"
and all that...
---
>I must confess, however, I'm a little curious. How do you manage to
>make yourself look increasingly stupid every time you post?

---
I don't; it's an optical illusion which affects those like you who
aren't able to keep up as the material gets progressively more
difficult. The "Genius talking to the moron" thing.
---
>Here you are, suggesting something that can be easily disproved with
>the click of a mouse.

---
Disprove away, then.
---
>That wasn't true for your pretend patent.

---
Something else you don't give a rat's ass about? Apparently, since
you're making almost as much of a commotion about it as about LOL,
LOL!

It wasn't a pretend patent at all, it was a document issued to me by
the Government of The United States of America which states that I'm
an inventor. Not a wannabe inventor, like you, but a _real_ one along
with some of the other guys here.

Matter of fact, since you seem to be so upset about it, I'll make your
sorry life a little easier: I've posted the patent number to USENET on
several occasions, and Google archives text articles so go looking for
it under my name there.

You do know how to use Google to make USENET searches, right?

JF
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!