I'm taking all comers.

Bret Cahill

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:10:20 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:

Show us some stuff you've designed.

John

www.BretCahill.com

Bret Cahill

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:58:20 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@peoplepc.com
wrote:

Cartoons. How about some hardware?

John

You want it delivered?

For what purpose?

Anyway you are already down one straw. You have never generated a
single novel idea in your entire life.

Since you have no IP or web page, perhaps you'ld like to try something
else?

Maybe you want to impress someone with your proficiency in vector
calculus?

Maybe you unnerstand Maxwell's equations.

Show us what you got.

Bret Cahill

BretCahill@peoplepc.com wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:10:20 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:

On Jul 31, 12:58 am, BretCah...@peoplepc.com wrote:

I think you've made your point Bret. It should be easy for any of
these guys to critique your proposal, particularly John Larkin who is
in the coffee processing business. But as usual, I'm the one who has
to pick up the burden...

Referring to picture 2:

Before we get into the actual physics of it, where would you apply
this? Why are we heating up liquids and then transferring the heat to
a gas? Are you talking about something like auto radiators when you
say radiator?

-tg

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:10:20 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:

Commercially available stacked flat plat heat exchangers are far more
efficient.. (no need for a working fluid, greater surface area, higher
heat transfer coefficient.) .

http://www.flatplate.com/?gclid=COnUk8KQ6pQCFQpzHgod-lP-RQ

Or just google

"stacked flat plate heat exchangers"

All ya gotta do is put out the shoe and the idiots step right in to
demonstrate it fits: