On Oct 26, 5:19 pm, Angus Rodgers bigfoot.com> wrote:

On Oct 27, 5:11 pm, galathaea gmail.com> wrote:

arbitrarily

"sense, existence, knowledge"

Whereas in reality there has to be something to sense AND identified.

Therefore

Existence, sense, non-contradictory identification, knowledge.

Michael Gordge

On Oct 27, 3:19 am, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:

And the beat goes on.

And the beat goes on.

Drums keep a poundin' rhythm to the brain.....

On Oct 27, 8:04 pm, Don Stockbauer hotmail.com> wrote:

You Kantians should try it, e.g. let your ear drums pound BEFORE you
claim knowledge of noise, that way the mystical Kantian god like
voices inside your heads will eventually go away.

MG

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:11:50 -0700, galathaea wrote:

Wow.

Truths imply the possibility of falsehood which itself implies a judgment,
evaluation or finding on one thing or another.

If you revamp this to: "If all existence is truth always", it relieves the
close ended burden of judgment made upon any one selection and opens
infinite possibilities of discovery of all things.

On Oct 27, 4:11 am, galathaea gmail.com> wrote:

In the process of constructing we are forced to grant properties.
This grant deserves scrutiny.
If it is overly complicated then we might seek a simpler grant which
will beget similar consequences.
We are ultimately concerned with consequences.

The correspondence principle of quantum mechanics may be taken as
general in this regard and extended to any construction.

The grants form a basis.
So long as the consequences we seek are in terms of reality then we
are seeking reality's basis.
If one chooses to focus on a single branch of mathematics I think
these same concepts apply but in narrowed form.

[Far-flung cross-posting maintained, with misgivings.]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:11:50 -0700, galathaea
gmail.com> wrote:

[a lot, which I've read]

I'm still struggling to understand this difficult text you've
presented me with. I have read it slowly and carefully, and
re-read it, but I still don't know if I can come up with any
worthwhile response.

(I feel rather as if I had stumbled across something written
by Lacan or Heidegger, which looks as if it might be about
something of great personal interest to me, even something
very familiar, but still seems hopelessly hard to decipher,
so that I feel like a complete idiot and ignoramus.)

Meanwhile, in the course of my struggles, I find myself wanting
to know the answer to another naive question, which is only
quite loosely related to my first question, so I hope you won't
take it amiss if I just go ahead and ask it.

"Michael Gordge" xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:1193488454.068426.199610@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Not go away, but identified for what it is.

BOfL

"ZerkonX" zerkonx.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.10.27.12.53.46.860946@zerkonx.net...

Discovery followed by creativity.

BOfL

"Angus Rodgers" bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:5qh6i3t5gvctdh2k295p8r4j2rh7cgu239@4ax.com...
: [Far-flung cross-posting maintained, with misgivings.]
:
: On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:11:50 -0700, galathaea
: gmail.com> wrote:
:
: [a lot, which I've read]
:
: I'm still struggling to understand this difficult text you've
: presented me with. I have read it slowly and carefully, and
: re-read it, but I still don't know if I can come up with any
: worthwhile response.
:
: (I feel rather as if I had stumbled across something written
: by Lacan or Heidegger, which looks as if it might be about
: something of great personal interest to me, even something
: very familiar, but still seems hopelessly hard to decipher,
: so that I feel like a complete idiot and ignoramus.)
: ...