... they were saying: How about if the child had been injured or killed by tripping and ... they maintain it is the other parent or child minder who is to blame instead? Would ...>> responsible for not making sure that a child - which he would certainly have known was about... with whoever should have been supervising the child. You really do get ever more pathetic in...

...>> >> The driver shares responsibility with whoever should have been supervising the child. Interesting take. In what way? How about if the child had been injured or killed by tripping and falling down some ... killer motorist, do they maintain it is the other parent or child minder who is to blame instead? Would this still apply in ...

... Another reminder that cars can kill. Discuss: who was to blame, the driver or his vulnerable victim? The driver shares responsibility with whoever should have been supervising the child. Interesting take. So, for example, in other crash examples, not members of the same family, if both are to blame insurance companies would have to payout twice? I can't see them ...

...ve even quoted me saying that the driver certainly is responsible for not making sure that a child - which he would certainly have known was about - was not at risk. Let me ... you. The driver shares responsibility with whoever should have been supervising the child. You really do get ever more pathetic in the amount of twisting you're willing to ...

... they were saying: How about if the child had been injured or killed by tripping and ... they maintain it is the other parent or child minder who is to blame instead? Would this...> responsible for not making sure that a child - which he would certainly have known was about... with whoever should have been supervising the child. You really do get ever more pathetic in...

... like they were saying: How about if the child had been injured or killed by tripping and...they maintain it is the other parent or child minder who is to blame instead? Would ...is responsible for not making sure that a child - which he would certainly have known was about...responsibility with whoever should have been supervising the child. You really do get ever more pathetic ...

Doug wrote: So, in this latest attempt of motorists here to divert blame away from the killer motorist, do they maintain it is the other parent or child minder who is to blame instead? Would this still apply in the case of, say, a drunken driver or an unlicensed driver or a hit and run driver? Or to put it another way, according to motorists on this NG is there no way motorists...

...> >> The driver shares responsibility with whoever should have been supervising the child. Interesting take. In what way? How about if the child had been injured or killed by tripping and falling down some ... the killer motorist, do they maintain it is the other parent or child minder who is to blame instead? Would this still apply in the ...

...>>> driver or his vulnerable victim? The driver shares responsibility with whoever should have been supervising the child. Interesting take. In what way? How about if the child had been injured or killed by tripping and falling down some steps whilst similarly left roaming unattended? To follow Dougs ...

..., the driver or his vulnerable victim? The driver shares responsibility with whoever should have been supervising the child. Interesting take. In what way? How about if the child had been injured or killed by tripping and falling down some steps whilst similarly left roaming unattended?