> "The explosive vigour of the universe is thus matched with almost
> unbelievable accuracy to its gravitating power. The big bang was not
> evidently, any old bang, but an explosion of exquisitely arranged
> magnitude."
> Paul Davies, Superforce: The Search for a Grand Unified Theory of
> Nature, 1984, p. 184
>
> “If the rate of expansion one second after the big bang had been
> smaller by even one part in a hundred thousand million million, the
> universe would have recollapsed before it ever reached its present
> size.”
>
> Stephen Hawking, A Brief History Of Time, Bantam Press, London: 1988,
> p. 121-125
>
> "…Something else has to be behind things, somehow guiding them. And
> that, one might say, is a kind of mathematical proof of divinity."
> Guy Marchie, American Science Writer
> Guy Murchie, The Seven Mysteries of Life, Boston: The Houghton Mifflin ...

> "The explosive vigour of the universe is thus matched with almost
> unbelievable accuracy to its gravitating power. The big bang was not
> evidently, any old bang, but an explosion of exquisitely arranged
> magnitude."
> Paul Davies, Superforce: The Search for a Grand Unified Theory of
> Nature, 1984, p. 184
>
> “If the rate of expansion one second after the big bang had been
> smaller by even one part in a hundred thousand million million, the
> universe would have recollapsed before it ever reached its present
> size.”
>
> Stephen Hawking, A Brief History Of Time, Bantam Press, London: 1988,
> p. 121-125
>
> "…Something else has to be behind things, somehow guiding them. And
> that, one might say, is a kind of mathematical proof of divinity."
> Guy Marchie, American Science Writer
> Guy Murchie, The Seven Mysteries of Life, Boston: The Houghton Mifflin ...

> "In its standard form, the big bang theory

> OTOH, it is much more mentally pleasing to imagine that the universe was
> made for our own existence. All that stuff! For US! Why?

> "The explosive vigour of the universe is thus matched with almost
> unbelievable accuracy to its gravitating power. The big bang was not
> evidently, any old bang, but an explosion of exquisitely arranged
> magnitude."
> Paul Davies, Superforce: The Search for a Grand Unified Theory of
> Nature, 1984, p. 184
>
> “If the rate of expansion one second after the big bang had been
> smaller by even one part in a hundred thousand million million, the
> universe would have recollapsed before it ever reached its present
> size.”
>
> Stephen Hawking, A Brief History Of Time, Bantam Press, London: 1988,
> p. 121-125
>
> "…Something else has to be behind things, somehow guiding them. And
> that, one might say, is a kind of mathematical proof of divinity."
> Guy Marchie, American Science Writer
> Guy Murchie, The Seven Mysteries of Life, Boston: The Houghton Mifflin ...

> On Sep 4, 10:31 pm, Hamady gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> "The explosive vigour of the universe is thus matched with almost
>> unbelievable accuracy to its gravitating power. The big bang was not
>> evidently, any old bang, but an explosion of exquisitely arranged
>> magnitude."
>> Paul Davies, Superforce: The Search for a Grand Unified Theory of
>> Nature, 1984, p. 184

>

>> “If the rate of expansion one second after the big bang had been
>> smaller by even one part in a hundred thousand million million, the
>> universe would have recollapsed before it ever reached its present
>> size.”

>

>> Stephen Hawking, A Brief History Of Time, Bantam Press, London: 1988, ...

> On Sep 4, 11:31 pm, Hamady gmail.com> wrote:
> ...to fill the Earth and subdue it.
>
>  One should not search for the meaning of life
> The answer to the meaning of life is too profound to be known and
> understood.

> You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life.

> The meaning of life is to forget about the search for the meaning of
> life.
> One should live the life given to you instead.

> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:31:11 -0700, Hamady wrote:

>> "In its standard form, the big bang theory

>
> is part of sequential causal reasoning from which there can be no other
> point of arrival other than primary cause, a prime mover, a super-
> something that began it all. There must be a beginning, after all.
>
> What if this reasoning is in error and a limitation that serves only
> immediate human utility?  Absolute causes (a beginning, a cause, laws
> of...) are a human necessity. Very likely, little else.