Re: ...Science Reinvents God... by Stuart Kauffman
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: ...Science Reinvents God... by Stuart Kauffman         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: BradGuth
Date: Sep 16, 2008 12:46

On Sep 10, 8:12 pm, "jonathan" write.instead.net> wrote:
> God as the Emergent Process of Creation.
>
> A pioneer of complexity science, Stuart A. Kauffman, M.D., is
> Chief Scientific Officer and Chairman of the Board, Bios Group Inc.
> Since 1985, he has served as a consultant to Los Alamos National
> Laboratory, and from 1986 to 1998 as Professor at the Santa Fe
> Institute. Major areas of research include Developmental Genetics,
> Theoretical Biology, Evolution, and the Origin of Life. He was
> awarded the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Fellowship
> and The Herbert A. Simon Award.
>
> Beyond Reductionism: Reinventing the Sacred
>
> Stuart Kauffman
>
> Abstract
>
> "We have lived under the hegemony of the reductionistic scientific worldview
> since Galileo, Newton, and Laplace. In this view, the universe is meaningless,
> as Stephen Weinberg famously said, and organisms and a court of law are "nothing
> but" particles in morion. This scientific view is inadequate. Physicists are
> beginning to abandon reductionism in favor of emergence. Emergence, both
> epistemological and ontological, embraces the emergence of life and of agency.
> With agency comes meaning, value, and doing, beyond mere happenings. More
> organisms are conscious. None of this violates any laws of physics, but it
> cannot be reduced to physics. Emergence is real, and the tiger chasing the
> gazelle are real parts of the real universe.
>
> We live, therefore, in an emergent universe. This emergence often is entirely
> unpredictable beforehand, from the evolution of novel functionalities in
> organisms to the evolution of the economy and human history. We are surrounded
> on all sides by a creativity that cannot even be prestated. Thus we have the
> first glimmerings of a new scientific worldview, beyond reductionism. In our
> universe emergence is real, and there is ceaseless, stunning creativity that has
> given rise to our biosphere, our humanity, and our history. We are partial
> co-creators of this emergent creativity.
>
> It is our choice whether we use the God word. I believe it is wise to do so. God
> can be our shared name for the true creativity in the natural universe. Such a
> view invites a new sense of the sacred, as those aspects of the creativity in
> the universe that we deem worthy of holding sacred. We are not logically forced
> to this view. Yet a global civilization, hopefully persistently diverse and
> creative, is emerging. I believe we need a shared view of God, a fully natural
> God, to orient our lives. We need a shared view of the sacred that is open to
> slow evolution, because rigidity in our view of the sacred violates how our most
> precious values evolve and invites ethical hegemony. We need a shared global
> ethic beyond our materialism. I believe a sense of God as the natural, awesome
> creativity in the universe can help us construct the sacred and a global ethic
> to help shape the global civilization toward what we choose with the best of our
> limited wisdom."
>
> http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/kauffman06/kauffman06_index.html
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> limited wisdom.

It is well enough mainstream accepted that there has been a good God
and a bad God.

The well educated and otherwise technologically informed Cathars were
among the few trying their best intensions at keeping us in tune or
focused upon what a good God would have liked of us humans to strive
for.

Obviously the Roman Catholic bad God knew how to kick serious butt,
and their Pope (aka commander and chief faith-based moron of that era)
did just that, setting up an example that clearly impressed Hitler,
and not otherwise having gone unnoticed by his white skinned Zionist
puppet masters as having a global domination plan of their very own.

Hitler and of his physics and science company of Zionist goons plus
countless servitude minions treated those of their concentration camps
better off than rabbi Saul and Deco has treated far too many within
Usenet/newsgroups, and yet folks like Stuart Kauffman and yourself so
often keep entertaining our resident republican Godfather perverts as
though they are even slightly human.

One thing for certain, your Eden should have no accommodations for the
likes of rabbi Saul unless given preferential status by way of
yourself. Do you really want the likes of Saul and other pretend-
Atheists as intellectual predatory perverts in your Eden?

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG
18 Comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!