On Aug 11, 9:37 am, Nobody wrote:
> Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
>> On Aug 11, 6:48 am, Nobody wrote:
>>> Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
>>>> Which essentially says that the graph was never meant to model
>>>> temperatures in the last century or so; making it essentially
>>>> worthless for arguing what was supposed to be your main point -
>>>> that temperatures were hotter 1000 years ago.
>
>>> It isn't maent to model temperatures in the last century. That
>>> is THIS century you idiot. That makes it worthless to argue
>>> EITHER point if you want to be technical.
>
>> Then I take it you are admitting that temperatures weren't higher
>> 1000 years ago. Thanks for conceding the point.
>
> Is there anything that you actually understand?
I understand what the original argument was, loser.
>
>>>> And I lost count of how many times I had to show you that
>>>> little arrow marked '2004'.
>
>>> The 'little arrow' is as plain as your stupidity.
>
>> Oooooh, someone's mad about getting their butt kicked.
>
> Butt kicked, LOL? You aren't even a challenge. After the spanking you
> have been getting I am suprised you haven't tried the Nazi lover shit
> like you usually do. Perhaps there is some hope for you yet.
Nah, you just got your argument shot down, you're doing finnnnneeeee.
>
>
>
>>>>>>> You truly are an ignorant git. I ALWAYS post using the
>>>>>>> same newsreader and NNPT server. Well, I changed to shared
>>>>>>> secrets after readfreenews went dowm. The ame is not
>>>>>>> capitalized nor is the mail address the same. \
>
>>>>>> All that means is that you're posting from a different
>>>>>> address at work. And you forgot to capitalize the "N" when
>>>>>> you set up the work account.
>
>>>>> Jeez you are think. I have REPLIED to the other guy you
>>>>> idiot.
>
>>>> So? No problem to reply to your own messages from home or
>>>> work.
>
>>> Are you treuly this thick or do you make a special effort for
>>> usenet?
>
>> Evasion noted.
>
> Evasion? I make you look stupid for a dumbass comment you make and you
> call it evasion. No wonder you are a laughing stock here.
LOL! You think anyone's impressed by your cheap shot? And you still
haven't addressed the main point.
>
>>>>Show me one whit of
>>>> evidence that I've ever posted under my real name.
>
> So, you are admitting then that Siobhan Medeiros is NOT your real name.
> I figured so.
And I suppose "Nobody" is, hypocrite.
>
>>> YOu use both Siobhan Medeiros and sbm2...@shaw.ca to post.
>>> While they are both you, it doesn't look like it when gatting
>>> message headers.
>
>> Oh, please. That's just some glitch in using Google Groups.
>> Sometimes it posts using my e-mail instead of my name for some
>> reason. I have absolutely no control over it and there are other
>> posters who've had the same problem.
>
> Not exactly correct but I can understand what is happening.
>
>>> So, why do you use a woman's name to post when you said that you
>>> are not female?
>
> Well? Evasion noted.
None of your fucking business, how's that?
>
>> Strange how it's either you or the "other guy" that responds to my
>> post, never both at once.
>
> No, it isn't strange at all. You are just being your usual dense self.
> People are going to continue to make you look like a moron if you can't
> understand basic concepts.
Oh yeah, you're doing soooooooo well so far.
>
>> Why haven't you asked him to change his handle?
>
> Why should I? I know the difference and, it seems, so does everyone
> else here but you. The other poster doesn't capitalize the name and,
> it seems is only showing up in can.politics due to some crossposting.
> It is likely a temporary duplication.
