Science Disproves Evolution
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Science Disproves Evolution         


Author: Pahu78
Date: Sep 4, 2008 11:41

Convergent Evolution or Intelligent Design? 1

When the same complex capability is found in unrelated organisms but
not in their alleged evolutionary ancestors, evolutionists say that a
common need caused identical complexities to evolve. They call this
convergent evolution.

For example, wings and flight occur in some birds, insects, and
mammals (bats). Pterosaurs, an extinct reptile, also had wings and
could fly. These capabilities have not been found in any of their
alleged...
Show full article (2.36Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Science Disproves Evolution         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Sep 4, 2008 22:34

On Sep 4, 11:41 am, Pah...@gmail.com wrote:
> Convergent Evolution or Intelligent Design? 1
>
> When the same complex capability is found in unrelated organisms but
> not in their alleged evolutionary ancestors, evolutionists say that a
> common need caused identical complexities to evolve. They call this
> convergent evolution.
>
> For example, wings and flight occur in some birds, insects, and
> mammals (bats). Pterosaurs, an extinct reptile, also had wings and
> could fly. These capabilities have not been found in any of their
> alleged common ancestors. Other examples of convergent evolution are
> the three tiny bones in the ears of mammals: the stapes, incus, and
> malleus. Their complex arrangement and precise fit give mammals the
> unique ability to hear a wide range of sounds. Evolutionists say that
> those bones evolved from bones in a reptile’s jaw. If so, the process
> must have occurred at least twice (a)—but left no known transitional
> fossils. How did the transitional organisms between reptiles and
> mammals hear during those millions of years (b)? Without the ability
> to hear, survival—and reptile-to-mammal evolution—would cease. ...
Show full article (3.87Kb)
no comments
Re: Science Disproves Evolution         


Author: turtoni
Date: Sep 4, 2008 22:42

On Sep 5, 1:34 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 4, 11:41 am, Pah...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> Convergent Evolution or Intelligent Design? 1
>
>> When the same complex capability is found in unrelated organisms but
>> not in their alleged evolutionary ancestors, evolutionists say that a
>> common need caused identical complexities to evolve.   They call this
>> convergent evolution.
>
>> For example, wings and flight occur in some birds, insects, and
>> mammals (bats). Pterosaurs, an extinct reptile, also had wings and
>> could fly. These capabilities have not been found in any of their
>> alleged common ancestors. Other examples of convergent evolution are
>> the three tiny bones in the ears of mammals: the stapes, incus, and
>> malleus. Their complex arrangement and precise fit give mammals the ...
Show full article (4.35Kb)
no comments
Re: Science Disproves Evolution         


Author: ZerkonX
Date: Sep 5, 2008 05:06

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:41:05 -0700, Pahu78 wrote:
> Convergent Evolution or Intelligent Design?

[Translation]

Known or Not Yet Known?
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
cvs commit: ports/science Makefile ports/science/bodr Makefilemailing.freebsd.cvs ·