> "Sean" now.com.au> wrote in
> news:48c3d367$0$28216$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au:
>

>>
>> "Immortalist" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:eb4d8be6-80d1-4077-9aae-0681b21c8a1d@p31g2000prf.googlegroups.com.
>> ..

>>> On Sep 6, 10:18 am, Publius nospam.comcast.net> wrote:

>>>> Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote
>>>> innews:140168dc-fa67-428e-b6e9-3e8166fe11da@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.
>>>> com:
>>>>

>>>>> But capitalist and capitalism are two separate things/ideas. The
>>>>> former is as you define, but the later is a means to decision of
>>>>> last resort. Its like the political science debate about what
>>>>> should be the final arbiter in a dispute between rights; a
>>>>> monarch, a representative body or individual rights.

>>>>

>>>>> Capitalism is the economic system in which the means of production
>>>>> are owned by private persons, and operated for profit and where
>>>>> investments, distribution, income, production and pricing of goods
>>>>> and services are predominantly determined through the operation of
>>>>> a free market.

>>>>

>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Immort. But I doubt that Sean will like Wiki any more than
>>>> he likes
>>>> dictionaries.

>>>
>>> What kind of evidence would he like?

>>
>> I don't need any type of evidence Imm.

>
> There's your answer, Immort. Sean has improvised a religious dogma, and
> like all such, it is impervious to evidence.
>