Re: Romanticism in science
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Romanticism in science         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Sir Frederick
Date: Dec 29, 2007 22:42

On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:20:42 -0800 (PST), turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>****QUOTING****:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanticism_in_science
>
>Romanticism, also known as the "Age of Reflexion," describes the
>intellectual movement from 1800-1840 that originated in Western Europe
>as a counter-movement to the Enlightenment of the late 18th century.
>Romanticism incorporated many fields of study, including art, music,
>poetry and drama, painting, prose, theology, and philosophy, yet it
>also had a major impact in sciences of the 19th century.[1]
>
>European scientists, disillusioned with the mechanical natural
>philosophy of the Enlightenment as well as the Newtonian model of
>physics, supported the belief that observing nature meant
>understanding the self and that the answers that nature could give us
>should not be obtained by force. They warned that Enlightenment
>encouraged the abuse of the sciences and sought to advance a new way
>of increasing scientific knowledge, one they felt would be even more
>beneficial to not only mankind but to nature as well.[2]
>
>Romanticism set forth different themes: it was anti-reductionist (the
>whole was more valuable than the parts alone), championed
>epistemological optimism (man was connected to nature), and encouraged
>creativity, experience, and genius.[3] It also emphasized the
>scientist's role in scientific discovery as understanding that
>acquiring knowledge of nature meant understanding man as well;
>therefore, these scientists had a profound respect for nature.[4]
>
>The decline of Romanticism occurred because a new movement,
>Positivism, began to take hold of the ideals of the intellectuals
>around 1840 that lasted until about 1880. Like the intellectuals who
>were disenchanted with the Enlightenment and preferred a new approach
>to science, people lost interest in Romanticism and wanted to study
>science using a stricter process.

The "folk theories" do resist removal. They have the
cultural "inertia" of eons of use. It's just that "the times
they are changin". Thus new paradigms must be told.
Romanticism served the hubris needs of humans, but lost
functional value. We must find our hubris needs met elsewhere
or perhaps attenuate them. Even today we struggle
in Romanticism quagmires :

The human race, in whole and in part, has such
false models of what it is and means to be human,
and considers those false models to be reality, that
the human race is dysfunctional. Those models may
have worked through the eons of evolution,
they no longer "work".

My sympathies.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
cvs commit: ports/science Makefile ports/science/bodr Makefilemailing.freebsd.cvs ·