|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: MarsMars Date: Aug 22, 2007 15:34
Religion is only required in order to teach humans how to behave.
If humans behaved correctly - there would be no such thing as Religion.
|
| |
|
| | 160 Comments |
|
|
Author: Mark EarnestMark Earnest Date: Aug 22, 2007 16:24
> Religion is only required in order to teach humans how to behave.
> If humans behaved correctly - there would be no such thing as Religion.
IOW, religion is just a way to get to God. They do not replace him.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: JohnJohn Date: Aug 22, 2007 16:25
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:34:10 GMT, "Mars" somewhere.com>
wrote:
>Religion is only required in order to teach humans how to behave.
>If humans behaved correctly - there would be no such thing as Religion.
>
But the fact we invented religion means we do -want- to behave
correctly.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Don StockbauerDon Stockbauer Date: Aug 22, 2007 16:34
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:34:10 GMT, "Mars" somewhere.com>
> wrote:
>>>Religion is only required in order to teach humans how to behave.
>>If humans behaved correctly - there would be no such thing as Religion.
>
> But the fact we invented religion means we do -want- to behave
> correctly.
GOD = THE UNIVERSE
THEREFORE
SCIENCE = RELIGION
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Mark EarnestMark Earnest Date: Aug 22, 2007 16:44
>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:34:10 GMT, "Mars" somewhere.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>Religion is only required in order to teach humans how to behave.
>>>If humans behaved correctly - there would be no such thing as Religion.
>>
>> But the fact we invented religion means we do -want- to behave
>> correctly.
>
> GOD = THE UNIVERSE
>
> THEREFORE
>
> SCIENCE = RELIGION
|
| Show full article (0.73Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: John DJohn D Date: Aug 22, 2007 16:44
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:34:14 -0700, Don Stockbauer
hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:34:10 GMT, "Mars" somewhere.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>Religion is only required in order to teach humans how to behave.
>>>If humans behaved correctly - there would be no such thing as Religion.
>>
>> But the fact we invented religion means we do -want- to behave
>> correctly.
>
>GOD = THE UNIVERSE
>
>THEREFORE
>
>SCIENCE = RELIGION
So science is basically or mainly not about understanding the
universe, but about improving it?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: brian fletcherbrian fletcher Date: Aug 22, 2007 17:01
hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:echpc3pmtmt192uul6ur5qk28ldhgfq1dl@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:34:10 GMT, "Mars" somewhere.com>
> wrote:
>>>Religion is only required in order to teach humans how to behave.
>>If humans behaved correctly - there would be no such thing as Religion.
>>
>
> But the fact we invented religion means we do -want- to behave
> correctly.
As a result of the laws of karma. We fell pain and discomfort, believing it
was caused by "outside influences".
Pain is the greatest motivator to find out what is really going on.
Religions flair up when pain dominates a culture.
BOfL
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: brian fletcherbrian fletcher Date: Aug 22, 2007 17:08
>>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:34:10 GMT, "Mars" somewhere.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>Religion is only required in order to teach humans how to behave.
>>>>If humans behaved correctly - there would be no such thing as Religion.
>>>
>>> But the fact we invented religion means we do -want- to behave
>>> correctly.
>>
>> GOD = THE UNIVERSE
>>
>> THEREFORE
>>
>> SCIENCE = RELIGION ...
|
| Show full article (1.42Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: picopico Date: Aug 22, 2007 17:28
Mars wrote:
> Religion is only required in order to teach humans how to behave.
> If humans behaved correctly - there would be no such thing as Religion.
Correctly? By who's definition? Lay it out, Mars.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
