|
|
Up |
  |
Author: ZerkonXZerkonX Date: Aug 29, 2008 07:09
This is a classic, refreshed by the 'Wilson'/CIA films of late.
======================================
The Libyans used Wilson's provisions to advance their interests around
the world, including training terrorist cells to build explosive devices
inside radios. One cell trained by Wilson's operatives was the Popular
Front for the Liberation of Palestine ....
.........................
Wilson was indicted by the US Justice Department for firearms and
explosives violations.
.........................
His lawyer was David Adler, a former CIA agent who had clearance to view
classified documents. Adler spent long hours poring through thousands of
files and eventually found eighty incidents where Wilson met on a
professional basis with the CIA and proof that the CIA had indirectly
used Wilson...
|
| Show full article (1.40Kb) |
| 4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Aug 29, 2008 23:32
On Aug 29, 7:09 am, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:
>
> Philosophically, power needs an enemy. A enemy asset is the enemy
> controlled and used by that power to frighten the 'protected' into
> submission and to fleece money from them.
>
> The real matrix is the 'enemy world' created by this power.
Fascist America, in 10 easy steps
From Hitler to Pinochet and beyond, history shows there are certain
steps that any would-be dictator must take to destroy constitutional
freedoms. And, argues Naomi Wolf, George Bush and his administration
seem to be taking them all
1. Invoke a terrifying internal and
external enemy
2. Create a gulag (a prison system
outside the rule of law)
3. Develop a thug caste (paramilitary groups
of scary young men out to terrorise citizens)
4. Set up an internal surveillance system
|
| Show full article (29.22Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ZerkonXZerkonX Date: Aug 30, 2008 08:06
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:32:42 -0700, Immortalist wrote:
> Fascist America, in 10 easy steps
Right. The definitions are in place and have been for some time now.
I am re-reading Huxley's 'Brave New World Revisited' ala 1958. Most parts
could have been written yesterday.
The point is not many of these definitions are permitted into public and
political dialog which does define social reality (the Matrix) to the
society itself.
This guy Wilson operated, it seems, at a near absolute cross propose and
completely outside of given and accepted reasoning. As if there existed
another world or another dimension to the 'real' one making the question
'what is the real one?' come to mind.
Naomi Wolf writes today what essentially many others have written before
her, not meaning to detract from her book at all actually more in praise
of it.
The point here being all the cushy and breezy definitions of political
cause and reason should not be trusted at face value. If in doubt, don't
believe it. Always in doubt, never believe it.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Aug 30, 2008 22:48
On Aug 30, 8:06 am, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:32:42 -0700, Immortalist wrote:
>> Fascist America, in 10 easy steps
>
> Right. The definitions are in place and have been for some time now.
>
> I am re-reading Huxley's 'Brave New World Revisited' ala 1958. Most parts
> could have been written yesterday.
>
> The point is not many of these definitions are permitted into public and
> political dialog which does define social reality (the Matrix) to the
> society itself.
>
> This guy Wilson operated, it seems, at a near absolute cross propose and
> completely outside of given and accepted reasoning. As if there existed
> another world or another dimension to the 'real' one making the question
> 'what is the real one?' come to mind.
>
> Naomi Wolf writes today what essentially many others have written before
> her, not meaning to detract from her book at all actually more in praise ...
|
| Show full article (1.27Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ZerkonXZerkonX Date: Aug 31, 2008 11:02
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:48:47 -0700, Immortalist wrote:
> What is really strange is how there is nothing but silence in the media
> and from politicians. People want their right to privacy taken away I
> guess.
See, this is the exact point. Media nor politicians do not equal people.
Modern Corporate Media does more telling people how other people think
than reporting things for people to think about. How they arrive at such
certainty is open to question. It is a certainty that this is cheaper and
easier than actually going somewhere and reporting.
As far as the specific issue of Wilson and others like it (eg Mena, Ark)
is concerned and what Wolf and others have written about, it is brute
propaganda through silence.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|