|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Uncle AlUncle Al Date: Jan 5, 2008 10:00
Laurent wrote:
>
> Reality as Process
>
> Matter is a continuous, time dependent, self-organizing process.
[snip crap]
1) atoms
2) bullshit
Matter is discontinuous - hence 230 periodic crystallographic space
groups.
Protons are forever.
Entropy.
Idiot.
|
| |
|
| | 24 Comments |
|
  |
Author: LaurentLaurent Date: Jan 5, 2008 12:23
On Jan 5, 1:00 pm, Uncle Al hate.spam.net> wrote:
> Laurent wrote:
>
>> Reality as Process
>
>> Matter is a continuous, time dependent, self-organizing process.
>
> [snip crap]
>
> 1) atoms
> 2) bullshit
>
> Matter is discontinuous - hence 230 periodic crystallographic space
> groups.
> Protons are forever.
> Entropy.
>
> Idiot.
>
> -- ...
|
| Show full article (0.66Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: LaurentLaurent Date: Jan 5, 2008 13:18
On Jan 5, 1:00 pm, Uncle Al hate.spam.net> wrote:
> Laurent wrote:
>
>> Reality as Process
>
>> Matter is a continuous, time dependent, self-organizing process.
>
> [snip crap]
>
> 1) atoms
> 2) bullshit
>
> Matter is discontinuous - hence 230 periodic crystallographic space
> groups.
> Protons are forever.
> Entropy.
>
> Idiot.
>
> -- ...
|
| Show full article (5.63Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: TravelerTraveler Date: Jan 5, 2008 14:46
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:18:47 -0800 (PST), Laurent gmail.com>
wrote:
>Could space-time merely be an appearance, a feature that has to be
>abstracted from some deeper structure, a structure where space-time
>itself is not taken as basic? If this were the case, then it would
>be establishing locality that would present the problem. Could it be
>that locality itself is merely a relationship? This relationship
>dominates the macroscopic world, but it would not be universally
>valid at the quantum level. Yes there is relativity, but does that
>theory apply to the level of a single photon or only to a
>statistical ensemble of photons?
Wow man. This is cool stuff. Were you trained as a physicist or are
you self-taught? I would be surprised to learn that you were a trained
physicist. Brainwashing is a powerful drug, something that I had to
find out the hard way.
|
| Show full article (3.37Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
  |
Date: Jan 5, 2008 15:10
"Traveler" noasskissers.net> wrote in message
news:v010o3hh1baghqqtq11na1ra32t2d116ot@4ax.com...
Brainwashing is a powerful drug, something that I had to
| find out the hard way.
So you know you are brainwashed, then?
Well, I knew that, but it's nice to see someone admit it.
Kissed Wabnigger's arse yet?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: schoenfeld.oneschoenfeld.one Date: Jan 5, 2008 21:36
On Jan 6, 8:46 am, Traveler noasskissers.net> wrote:
[...]
> You are absolutely correct, IMO, to question the reality of space and
> time. Neither exists physically. They are abstract illusions of
> perception. Only positional properties and interactions (change) need
> to exist. Space and time can be *abstractly* derived from those two
> things. I (and others) have been saying this for a long time.
Reality is an illusion sourced from your own mind. You live in your
own brain, the imagination of yourself. One could say a conspiracy
waged by the subconcious mind against the concious. The subconcious
layers extend into and become the physical universe that the concious
mind thinks it observes and is separate to. Once you expand your
awareness it becomes pretty obvious. Reality is just a trick.
[...]
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: TravelerTraveler Date: Jan 5, 2008 22:35
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 21:36:08 -0800 (PST), schoenfeld.one@ gmail.com
wrote:
>Reality is an illusion sourced from your own mind.
Well, if reality is an illusion, and since Schoenfeld's mind is part
of reality, if follows that Schoenfeld's mind is an illusion as well.
I knew that. ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: schoenfeld.oneschoenfeld.one Date: Jan 5, 2008 22:38
On Jan 6, 4:35 pm, Traveler noasskissers.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 21:36:08 -0800 (PST), schoenfeld....@ gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>>Reality is an illusion sourced from your own mind.
>
> Well, if reality is an illusion, and since Schoenfeld's mind is part
> of reality, if follows that Schoenfeld's mind is an illusion as well.
> I knew that. ahahaha...
Know your enemy, know yourself.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: JeckylJeckyl Date: Jan 5, 2008 23:14
"Traveler" noasskissers.net> wrote in message
news:v010o3hh1baghqqtq11na1ra32t2d116ot@4ax.com...
> You are absolutely correct, IMO, to question the reality of space and
> time. Neither exists physically. They are abstract illusions of
> perception. Only positional properties and interactions (change) need
> to exist. Space and time can be *abstractly* derived from those two
> things. I (and others) have been saying this for a long time.
Interesting metaphysics / philosophical idea .. and certainly possible ..
all we really know about 'reality' (whatever the means) is our perceptions
and of space and time .. but we do know that whatever it is, it works in a
certain ways for everybody (and that we are discovering more about them as
we advance). What the reality is behind what we measure is really unknown.
> It is easy to prove logically that neither space not time can possibly
> exist.
No .. it isn't .. as everything we can determine about them implies that
they do.
> Most people think that nothing can move without time.
|
| Show full article (4.52Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: JeckylJeckyl Date: Jan 5, 2008 23:16
"Traveler" noasskissers.net> wrote in message
news:1gt0o3lsuk8kijenl5lctshkmpfrads9bk@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 21:36:08 -0800 (PST), schoenfeld.one@ gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>>Reality is an illusion sourced from your own mind.
>
> Well, if reality is an illusion, and since Schoenfeld's mind is part
> of reality, if follows that Schoenfeld's mind is an illusion as well.
> I knew that. ahahaha...
Aren't you now arguing against what you were just saying .. the space and
time are not real. If they are not real, then they must be illusions ..
yes?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|