Read This!
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Read This!         


Author: tg
Date: Jun 11, 2008 07:05

17 Comments
Re: Read This!         


Author: ta
Date: Jun 11, 2008 08:41

On Jun 11, 10:05 am, tg earthlink.net> wrote:

Like most academic/social science writing, this article seems long on
the problem and short on the solutions. I patiently read through this
lengthy article to get to the punch line, which seems to be this:

"The challenge is to maintain these convictions and yet objectively
face the root causes of problems, striving to imagine ways to resolve
them that are consistent with our values. referring to?> Population is one realm where this is not only
possible, but powerfully appealing-the success of a values-based
strategy is already evident. Leave to women, more than to anyone else,
the decision about when and how often to bear children."

That's it??? Maybe I've missed the details, but that seems a bit vague
and overly simplistic to me.
no comments
Re: Read This!         


Author: tg
Date: Jun 11, 2008 10:21

On Jun 11, 11:41 am, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
> On Jun 11, 10:05 am, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>> -tg
>
> Like most academic/social science writing, this article seems long on
> the problem and short on the solutions. I patiently read through this
> lengthy article to get to the punch line, which seems to be this:
>
> "The challenge is to maintain these convictions and yet objectively
> face the root causes of problems, striving to imagine ways to resolve
> them that are consistent with our values. > referring to?> Population is one realm where this is not only
> possible, but powerfully appealing-the success of a values-based
> strategy is already evident. Leave to women, more than to anyone else,
> the decision about when and how often to bear children."
>
> That's it??? Maybe I've missed the details, but that seems a bit vague ...
Show full article (1.66Kb)
no comments
Re: Read This!         


Author: ta
Date: Jun 11, 2008 11:48

On Jun 11, 1:21 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Jun 11, 11:41 am, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jun 11, 10:05 am, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> -tg
>
>> Like most academic/social science writing, this article seems long on
>> the problem and short on the solutions. I patiently read through this
>> lengthy article to get to the punch line, which seems to be this:
>
>> "The challenge is to maintain these convictions and yet objectively
>> face the root causes of problems, striving to imagine ways to resolve
>> them that are consistent with our values. >> referring to?> Population is one realm where this is not only
>> possible, but powerfully appealing-the success of a values-based ...
Show full article (3.84Kb)
no comments
Re: Read This!         


Author: tg
Date: Jun 11, 2008 12:32

On Jun 11, 2:48 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
> On Jun 11, 1:21 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jun 11, 11:41 am, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Jun 11, 10:05 am, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>> -tg
>
>>> Like most academic/social science writing, this article seems long on
>>> the problem and short on the solutions. I patiently read through this
>>> lengthy article to get to the punch line, which seems to be this:
>
>>> "The challenge is to maintain these convictions and yet objectively
>>> face the root causes of problems, striving to imagine ways to resolve
>>> them that are consistent with our values.
Show full article (4.96Kb)
no comments
Re: Read This!         


Author: ta
Date: Jun 11, 2008 13:27

On Jun 11, 3:32 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2:48 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jun 11, 1:21 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>> On Jun 11, 11:41 am, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>>> On Jun 11, 10:05 am, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>>> -tg
>
>>>> Like most academic/social science writing, this article seems long on
>>>> the problem and short on the solutions. I patiently read through this
>>>> lengthy article to get to the punch line, which seems to be this:
>
>>>> "The challenge is to maintain these convictions and yet objectively ...
Show full article (6.86Kb)
no comments
Re: Read This!         


Author: tg
Date: Jun 11, 2008 14:13

On Jun 11, 4:27 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
> On Jun 11, 3:32 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jun 11, 2:48 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Jun 11, 1:21 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>>> On Jun 11, 11:41 am, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> On Jun 11, 10:05 am, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>> -tg
>
>>>>> Like most academic/social science writing, this article seems long on
>>>>> the problem and short on the solutions. I patiently read through this
>>>>> lengthy article to get to the punch line, which seems to be this: ...
Show full article (8.04Kb)
no comments
Re: Read This!         


Author: ZerkonX
Date: Jun 12, 2008 06:02

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:41:45 -0700, ta wrote:
> Leave to women, more than to anyone else,

My favorite.

'more then anyone else'? Gee who could these others be?

'Declining' the Population has always been a huge issue, or rather just
how to do this. It always is ends up with a flirtation with euthanasia.

What IS going to happen is the rusting hyper-urbanized over-centralized
structure of 'industrialized societies' will change. This is the Biggest
Waste of Resources today. It is much more humane and actually self-
serving to move away from this old, tired, has-had-it's day structure.

no comments
Re: Read This!         


Author: tg
Date: Jun 12, 2008 10:34

On Jun 12, 9:02 am, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:41:45 -0700, ta wrote:
>> Leave to women, more than to anyone else,
>
> My favorite.
>
> 'more then anyone else'? Gee who could these others be?
>
> 'Declining' the Population has always been a huge issue, or rather just
> how to do this. It always is ends up with a flirtation with euthanasia.
>

As far as I know, European countries like Italy don't do a lot of
euthanasia, but their populations are declining.
> What IS going to happen is the rusting hyper-urbanized over-centralized
> structure of 'industrialized societies' will change. This is the Biggest
> Waste of Resources today.

Actually, urban living is far more efficient in terms of resources.

-tg
Show full article (0.87Kb)
no comments
Re: Read This!         


Author: ta
Date: Jun 12, 2008 12:36

On Jun 12, 9:02 am, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:41:45 -0700, ta wrote:
>> Leave to women, more than to anyone else,
>
> My favorite.
>
> 'more then anyone else'? Gee who could these others be?

The people who benefit from scarce conditions (and therefore the
conditions of poverty and ignorance that result in the disempowerment
of women).
> 'Declining' the Population has always been a huge issue, or rather just
> how to do this. It always is ends up with a flirtation with euthanasia.

I didn't see any mention of euthanasia in the article.
> What IS going to happen is the rusting hyper-urbanized over-centralized
> structure of 'industrialized societies' will change.

Which is only possible with alot fewer people on the planet.
> This is the Biggest
> Waste of Resources today. It is much more humane and actually self-
> serving to move away from this old, tired, has-had-it's day structure.
no comments
1 2