An open letter to the President of Iran.
by Kevin Alfred Strom
DEAR PRESIDENT AHMADINEJAD: I have read with great interest your
interview with the German magazine Der Spiegel and your open letter
to President George W. Bush. I am an American of European descent
who wishes to prevent war between our two countries. I also hope-
and work-for the self-determination of my own people; and I
believe that all the peoples who suffer under Jewish/Zionist
domination should stand together for one another's freedom.
I am the publisher of "Inside the 'Axis of Evil'" and I was recently
interviewed by your country's Mehr News Agency. I hope you will find
my thoughts helpful and illuminating in the causes of peace and
freedom.
The most important fact you must understand, as the forces of war
and hate increasingly target your country, is the near-total control
of the media of news and entertainment in the West-and especially
in America-by the Jewish minority. Even though Jews constitute a
tiny fraction-around 2 per cent.-of the population of the
U.S., they dominate the press, the television networks, the radio
networks, and the production and distribution of motion pictures.
I am the author of the research report Who Rules America?, which
documents this control in detail. My report begins with a survey of
the anti-European racial bias of the American media, which may seem
irrelevant to you; but I assure you it is not: Just as the Jews
flooded Palestine with non-Palestinians, they are also flooding
America and Europe with non-Europeans to weaken and divide the
people and make them easier to rule. In any case, I urge you to read
my entire report, since after that brief introduction I show, in
detail, absolute proof of the Jewish control of "American" mass
media. It is this control which ought to be of even more concern to
you than who becomes the next President of the United States or
which party nominally controls the U.S. Congress.
Because the major media in America are controlled by Zionist Jews-
Jewish supremacists-it is almost impossible for anti-Zionist or
even non-Zionist politicians to be elected here, making a sham of
our so-called democracy. If a candidate emerges who opposes the
Jewish/Zionist agenda, he is relentlessly attacked by the media, who
work day and night to slander him and blacken his reputation, so
that he becomes unelectable.
The leading politicians of both parties are well aware of this
Zionist control, and many privately deplore it: Witness Richard
Nixon's private remarks to Christian leader Billy Graham on the
destructive effects of Jewish power, even though in public he did
almost everything the Jews wanted; witness Vice President Spiro
Agnew's opposition to Zionism evident in private remarks and in his
novel The Canfield Decision, published only after he left office;
witness the statements of Jimmy Carter (that to oppose Israel is
"political suicide") and of Senator Ernest Hollings (that "You can't
have an Israel policy other than what AIPAC gives you....") only
after they had decided they were no longer going to run for
political office. Many other political leaders know that Jewish
supremacists control our media and thereby control our foreign
policy-but they do not have the courage to say so because of that
very media control.
This media control has even deformed religion in the United States:
The Christian Zionist organizations, which hardly existed a few
decades ago, have been given tremendous access to the television
airwaves and have, as a consequence, become a dominant force in
American Christianity. They form a very large part of what is called
the Religious Right in this country, and are largely responsible for
George Bush's political success. Even as many old-line Christian
denominations, like the Presbyterians, wake up to the inhuman,
genocidal agenda of Zionism, churches that have come under the sway
of Christian Zionism teach their flocks that "Israel can do no
wrong" and "Israel fulfills prophecy" et cetera-and thereby feed
the bloodlust of the Zionist neocons.
]
As you point out in your letter and your interview, the Jewish
Holocaust story is being used as a political tool to extract
compliance-and billions of dollars-from non-Jews. I deeply
appreciate your bringing the work of the revisionist historians, who
tell us that not every Jewish assertion about World War II is true,
to the attention of millions upon millions of people who otherwise
would never have heard of it.
May I draw your attention to a particularly pernicious Jewish use of
the tragedy of World War II? I'm referring to the demonization, as
"new Hitlers," of men-and nations-who want to have a
government not under the supervision of Zionist Jews.
In February, the Chairman of the Council of Jews in France said in
Paris: "The Iranian President's assertions do not rank behind
Hitler's Mein Kampf."
Paul Spiegel, President of the Central Council of Jews in Germany,
was quoted in Die Welt saying that your statements on Israel and
Jewish power "were the worst comment on this subject that he has
ever heard of a statesman since Adolf Hitler."
At the White House, according to Jewish writer Seymour Hersh in The
New Yorker magazine, you are routinely referred to as "Hitler."
All this indicates a strong desire for war on the part of those who
have already made it happen twice-in Afghanistan and Iraq-in
just the past few years. Slobodan Milosevic was called a new Hitler
because he resisted internationalist control of his country. The
result was the NATO war against Yugoslavia. Saddam Hussein was
called a new Hitler when he quit taking orders from Washington. What
followed was the war on, and occupation of, Iraq.
And now you are being portrayed by the Jewish establishment as a
"new Hitler." At the latest AIPAC conference, which was attended by
many of the most powerful Jews and powerful politicians in America,
the Ahmadinejad-as-Hitler image was far more than a metaphor or an
implication-it was a larger-than-life in-your-face assertion.
Here's a description of the event by a Jewish student who was there,
Alice Ollstein, as published in the Jewish Journal of Greater Los
Angeles:
'The speakers and "informational" videos left no gray area, no
place for dialog or debate, and certainly no place for dissent. I
especially squirmed at the parallels AIPAC drew between Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hitler. To the tune of more
dramatic classical music, the six enormous screens flashed back and
forth between Hitler giving anti-Jew speeches and Ahmadinejad giving
anti-Israel speeches. The famous post-Holocaust mantra "Never Again"
popped up several times. Everything was geared toward persuading the
audience that another Holocaust is evident ... unless we get them
first.'
And since nearly all Jews and a very large number of non-Jews in the
West have been programmed by the media to turn off all reason and
begin salivating for blood as soon as the name "Hitler" is invoked,
facts will not matter. Whatever "crimes" the Hitler-figure is
accused of will become real and he will become guilty. If the
Hitler-figure obeys every law and every rule, it will not matter. A
good example of this is your country's desire to develop nuclear
energy. As journalist Jörg Pfuhl points out "Virtually none of the
Western states recognize that uranium enrichment is absolutely
legal. There is no restriction by contract or by the law of nations.
Quite the contrary: Actually the Western countries would have the
duty to assist Iran with these activities, according to the
Non-Proliferation Treaty. As long as a state renounces the bomb it
is eligible for technical support by the nuclear powers." (emphasis
added) But you're "the new Hitler," so the facts don't matter.
President Ahmadinejad, right now the American people are weary of
war and even Bush's most ardent supporters don't think we've done
well in occupying Iraq. A new war will be a very hard sell. But the
Jewish supremacists who control the images on Americans' TV screens
and magazine pages want to destroy you. They are masters of the hard
sell. They are not men of honor and morality. They are not men of
truth.
They will use their intelligence agency assets to induce Muslims-
preferably Muslims with an Iranian connection-to attack America
again. They will "guide" a cell within your own government or
military so that it commits some act to harm Americans. They will
try to goad you-using some intolerable new act by Bush, which
they will have caused-into yourself threatening or attacking the
West. They will do any combination of the above, or something
equivalent that no one can anticipate. They will do literally
anything to start a war between our countries. You must guard
vigilantly against such acts of deception and violence. You must
give the warmongers no excuse.
There are signs of hope in this country-hope that the star of the
Jewish supremacists who rule us is now descending.
In the American state of Alabama, a man who openly questioned Jewish
power in this country-a man who called for the shutdown and
prosecution of a powerful Zionist-linked censorship group-was
very nearly nominated for the post of State Attorney General. Larry
Darby, who spoke at a recent meeting of my organization, National
Vanguard, was able to garner 44%% of the Democratic primary vote,
carrying many parts of the state-despite the fact that the
Jewish-dominated party bosses opposed him with all their might.
In the American state of Tennessee, a man named James Hart won the
Republican primary for Congress-with 73 per cent. of the vote-
while openly advocating for European-Americans and against the
ferocious opposition of the Jewish-controlled media and Jewish
supremacist organizations. Hart would doubtlessly have gone further
had he not been sabotaged by the bosses of his own Republican party,
who went so far as to have his name removed from the ballot.
Newspapers-and we know who dominates publishing in this country -
refused to run his advertisements, so many voters were prevented
from even hearing about him.
My organization operates a multimedia Web
site-V-News.org-
which features news articles, radio programs, and videos in direct
competition with the Jewish-controlled media. We operate with a very
small but very talented staff, who are mostly volunteers. Even
though we feature many original stories, and sometimes exclusive
scoops, every day, the news search engine
news.google.com has
refused to carry our stories ever since Jewish organizations
complained about our presence in their index.
Despite these limitations and attacks against us, our readership
ratings are soaring and are now comparable to or higher than those
of the Web sites of many major American media outlets such as the
Tampa Tribune, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, and many others. Our
readership ratings are routinely far in excess of those of Jewish
supremacist groups like the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith
and the World Jewish Congress. Our pages are read more than a
million times every month.
I say these things to you because I think that the Internet has
provided a wedge for the truth to get out to the American people,
and that my group and others, like Messrs. Darby and Hart, have
shown millions of Americans that there is an alternative view. If we
who believe in freedom from Jewish domination-we who believe in
true self-determination-can continue to expand our media
capabilities, then there is a chance that the Jewish media monopoly
will be seriously challenged and significantly diminished. That, I
believe, is the key to taking away their power to wipe out whole
nations and start wars whenever they choose.
That means more than just news sites and newspapers-it means
movie studios and publishing houses; it means DVDs and music videos;
it means bookstores and family centers. It means replacing the media
and infrastructure of the Jewish supremacists at every level.
Now, President Ahmadinejad, I am not suggesting that Iranians set up
as media barons in Europe and the U.S. (though that would be better
than the Jewish monopoly we have now). What I am suggesting is that
all of us who believe in freedom and self-determination for our own
peoples-all of us who want a government of our own not under
Jewish/internationalist supervision-ought to make breaking the
Jewish media monopoly one of our highest priorities. Whatever our
differences on other issues, we ought to cooperate in every way
possible to achieve that goal. For your part, I suggest a strong
effort to reach out to anti-war Americans of all parties and
affiliations, and making full use of the alternative media-the
"blogosphere" which includes National Vanguard and many other
outlets-that free-thinking Americans have created and which will,
I am sure, be very useful to the cause of peace and understanding
between our two peoples. Your grace in favoring these alternative
media with "scoops" and interviews will also make these alternative
media stronger.
I have devoted my life to the freedom of my people-people of
European descent-and I want you to understand that my desire for
racial and cultural integrity for my people is not an attack on your
people in any way. As my friend and colleague Dr. David Duke said
when he visited Syria recently, surely the Muslim world can
understand European and European-American nationalists' desire to
have their own nations and to end the mass immigration which has
been engineered by Jewish supremacists specifically to dilute and
weaken us as a people.
[
You would not countenance open borders in Iran. You would not
tolerate mass immigration of tens of millions of people culturally
and racially distinct from you-Europeans or Chinese, for example
-- whatever your high regard for those peoples. We have both seen
what massive Jewish immigration did to Palestine in the last
century. Something similar happened to America a few years earlier,
which allowed the Jewish supremacists to make my country their power
base. Without that power base, there would be no Israel today, and
no conflict between the Muslim world and the West.
The Jewish supremacists have a vision of the world as one nominally
"democratic," but with multiple races and cultures within each
country, and with their media always holding the balance of power
over elections, so that no one people can have its own government
and no leader can ever emerge to challenge their rule or the power
of their money. They want a world in which no people is allowed to
have its own leaders or its own government any more-except Jews,
except Israel. All other nations, as they see it, must become
"multi-ethnic" states, effectively ruled by their international
capital and their international media.
We who believe otherwise must prevent that world from coming into
being. It will be a slave world, a world without freedom, a world
without distinctive cultures, and world system from which no
dissident or free thinker can escape.
To that end, I hope you will think about National Vanguard's vision
of an alternative world, a world which can be summed up simply in
what I call the Maxim of Self-Determination: "Each people which
considers itself to be a people should, to the maximum extent
possible, live under its own government."
In closing, let me reiterate my thanks for your time and for your
frank, courageous, and truthful statements on some of the most
important issues of our age, and let me repeat my earnest wish that
our peoples will never make war on each other.
"Special Victims Unit is NBC's sleazy, sex-crime spinoff of Law and
Order.
The April 4th, 2003, episode was about two brothers who went on a
crime spree. They held up small groups of people with a single gun,
forced them to strip and have sex with one another -- including
homosexual sex -- and then shot them in the head. The victims were
robbed of money, watches, jewelry, and their ATM cards. (They were
forced to give their PIN numbers.) One couple was engaged, and the
woman's engagement ring was stolen. In one crime, the victims' SUV was
stolen. By my count, eleven people were killed, and two more were
abducted. Moreover, it turned out that the older brother beat up his
father, homosexually raped his younger brother, and tried to frame him
so he would take the blame for both of them.
Now this crime might remind VNN readers (and precious few others) of
the Wichita Massacre of December 14, 2000, in which two brothers,
Reginald and Jonathan Carr, held up five people with a single gun,
including a couple who were planning to be married. They raped the
women and forced their victims to have sex with one another, including
homosexual sex. The Carrs then forced their victims to withdraw money
from their ATMs. They stole money, watches, jewelry, the engagement
ring, and a SUV. They then they drove their victims to an icy field,
shot all five in the head, then ran over their bodies. Amazingly, one
woman survived.
There is no doubt that Special Victims Unit episode 86 is based on
the Wichita Massacre. But there are two main differences between the
Kansas and New York versions. First of all, in the TV show the
criminals are far worse: they kill more people, and although one of
them seems so pathetic he is almost sympathetic, the other is a
monster who raped and framed his brother and beat his father. Second,
in the Special Victims Unit episode, the criminals are two handsome,
blue-eyed White men, whereas the Carr brothers were ugly, scary-
looking Niggers.
Why was the race of the killers changed to adapt the Wichita Massacre
for nationwide broadcast on NBC? For the same reason that the Wichita
Massacre was not given nationwide coverage on NBC or any other
network: the killers were Black and the victims were White. Now, the
networks did not spike the story because heinous Black-on-White crimes
are so unusual that giving them national coverage would mislead people
into thinking such crimes are common. That didn't stop the networks
from giving national coverage to the killing of the Black James Byrd
by Whites in Jasper, Texas. In fact, Black-on-White crime is far more
common than White-on-Black crime, but this fact is consciously hidden
from the populace by the television networks while they subject Whites
to a never ending guilt trip for the comparatively rare crimes they
commit against Blacks. This kind of propaganda may explain why the
victims in Wichita went to their deaths like sheep.
The sadistic and savage nature of both crimes indicates that the
killers were motivated by more than just greed. In the case of the
Wichita massacre, that motive was racial hatred of Whites. In the
Special Victims Unit episode, the motive could not be racial, so it
was ascribed to resentment against rich people.
And why were the crimes of the fictional killers made so much worse?
The main agenda of the writers was to exploit the Wichita Massacre
while concealing the racial aspect. But they may have had a subsidiary
agenda. Since they know that the internet makes it impossible for them
to keep everyone ignorant of the Wichita Massacre, they may have
decided to defuse its racial element and its shock value by showing
that Whites can do the same sort of thing, but far worse.
The Jewish agenda of the mass media systematically conceals Black
criminality and morally intimidates well-meaning Whites from
protecting themselves against it. This cultural atmosphere made the
Wichita Massacre possible. The networks would not give national
coverage to the real crime. But it was too lurid for the media Jews to
leave alone. So they took the crime that their brethren helped create,
scrubbed it of racial truths, and turned it into another piece of
anti-White propaganda to help lull the victims of the next massacre to
sleep.
What town will the next massacre be named for? Will it be yours?"
THE CAT LADY
------------------------
Additional information on SVU and the men behind it:
The series is filmed on location in New York City by Wolf Films in
association with Universal Television and Studios USA. Its producers:
Neal Baer - Executive Producer (cannot be ascertained if Baer is a
jew,
but Baer is a common jewish name; Baer is an MD as well as a writer;
he was the MD-adviser behind E.R., and now SVU
Dick Wolf - Executive Producer (a New York City Catholic who wrote
"School Ties" (1992) about anti-jew bigotry at a prep school)
Ted Kotcheff - Executive Producer (best friend of Canadian jew
novelist Mordecai Richler; married to possible jewess named Marburg)
Peter Jankowski - Executive Producer
Dick Wolf - Creator (note that one of his co-producers on the Crime &
Punishment production team, Bill Guttentag, made the "documentary"
"
Hate.com" for HBO)
The matrix of jews and jew-friendlies from which SVU emerges makes
inconceivable the accurate depiction of interracial crime, and
guarantees whites will be portrayed as uniquely vicious, violent,
greedy and dangerous -- the opposite of the truth. Jew Ben Stein
described the mentality at work in his book The View From Sunset
Boulevard, a review of which you can read here.
The company that produces SVU for NBC is Universal, whose president is
Steve Rosenberg, the jew marketer behind Jerry Springer, Maury Povich,
and Sally Jesse Raphael - jews all. Jerry Springer, if you haven't
heard of him, is not merely the host of the sleaziest talk show in the
history of the world, but an ex-mayor of Cincinnati famous for paying
a prostitute with a city check.
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/vnn/showEssay.asp?essayID=1172
"It is said that the Jews, at least the Ashkenazi Jews, have a
higher average IQ than Whites, at least Whites as loosely defined
by the designers of the IQ tests. [ <
http://tinyurl.com/ihhe> ]
According to Professor Richard Lynn, writing in Personality and
Individual Differences on April 2d, 2003, the average verbal IQ
of American Jews is about 108, which, some people argue, might
explain the disproportionate number of Jews in certain positions.
[ <
http://tinyurl.com/ihif> ] For example, although Jews are only
about 2 to 3%% of the U.S. population, they constitute 23%% of the
wealthiest Americans, 30%% of the faculty at "elite" universities,
11%% of Nobel Physics prizes, 60%% of Yale graduate students, 60%%
of "top Hollywood positions" (according to 60 Minutes), and 76%%
of "most influential intellectuals" (according to Alan
Dershowitz).
It's in verbal IQ -- not mathematical or visuospatial ability --
that Jews excel, and, when you consider that the fast-talking,
quick-thinking sharpster or con man is almost a Jewish
stereotype, then common experience confirms the data. [
<
http://tinyurl.com/ihje> ] This would mean that the Jewish
advantage would show itself mainly in areas like law, politics,
journalism, media, advertising, public relations, and other
fields in which verbal skills, persuasion, word-weaving, or
illusion-weaving are especially valuable. And that's what the
statistics indicate. Though Jews are over represented in physics
and math, they are far more over represented in Hollywood and law.
This is another case where our day-to-day experience perfectly
matches the science, and is essentially undeniable.
According to Professor Lynn, in the article cited above, we would
expect that the Jewish population would produce highly
intelligent individuals, with an IQ over 130, at a rate four
times higher than that of Whites. Even if we put the Jewish
percentage at 3%% of the total population, that would mean that we
would expect that Jews would constitute some 12%% of
high-achievers in the United States. But that isn't the case,
especially in areas well-known to be dominated by Jews. Instead
we see them at 76%% of "influential intellectuals," 60%% of
Hollywood executives, and 30%% of "elite" college faculty. Why
this wild over representation, far beyond what we'd expect based
on the IQ scores? [ <
http://tinyurl.com/ihk2> ] Some have argued
that Jewish families are far more concerned than White families
about the academic and professional success of their offspring,
and concentrate far more of their time and energy and money on
making sure that their children succeed in school and go on to
the best careers possible. Others point out that Jews have a far
higher degree of group consciousness -- of racial identity --
than Whites, and that this intense ethnic identity makes Jews
willing and eager to put their group interests above other
interests, even individual economic interests. Thus Jews are more
willing to help their fellow Jews because they are Jews (which
experience tells us they do in so many different ways that it
boggles the mind) than Whites are willing to help their fellow
Whites because they are Whites (which happens far too seldom, and
which is socially unacceptable anyway -- even illegal -- in the
insane social and "moral" system which crafty Jews and decadent
Whites have imposed on us). So Jews will preferentially hire
other Jews; Jews will openly organize themselves to advance
Jewish interests; Jews will portray Jews as sympathetic
characters in their entertainment media; Jews will show Jewish
interests as morally right in their news media; and, most
importantly in my view, Jews will demonize any who oppose Jewish
interests or who promote White interests. All of these things
have an effect on the Jewish success rate in various fields, and
the last mentioned has a profound effect in making many Gentiles,
many Whites, act to promote Jewish success and Jewish interests
and also makes them, in many cases, act against their own
individual interests and their own racial interests. In fact,
Jewish influence has been paramount in constructing the 'liberal'
moral paradigm of the 20th century, which in effect says that
acting in the interest of White people and doing anything which
tends to support our continued existence in the world -- whether
opposing racial mixing or working for an exclusive living space
for Whites -- is "racism" and of course "racism" is the ultimate
in evil according to this Jewish-created "morality...'
Kevin Alfred Strom
