On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:00:44 GMT, "Suzanne"
flash.net>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>
>"Robibnikoff"
broomstick.com> wrote in message
>news:64uqu1F2brs9vU1@mid.individual.net...>>>
>>> "Robibnikoff"
broomstick.com> wrote in message
>>> news:64pjraF2ahanfU1@mid.individual.net...>>>>
>>>> "Suzanne"
flash.net> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> People give you evidence. The Bible is part of the
>>>>> evidence. You deem it not evidence. You don't care
>>>>> that it's the writings of people who have testified with
>>>>> their lives. You pass it off with your man-made skeptic
>>>>> based ideas. You dismiss it. Then when someone
>>>>> bring evidences to you, you pronounce that they are
>>>>> not evidence.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe because it's not objective and veriable evidence.
>>>>
>>>> Tell, why do you reject the "evidence" of other religions?
>>>>
>>> Robyn, if you don't think the Bible is objective
>>> and doesn't have verifiable evidence, then you
>>> should go find out what archaeological finds
>>> have been brought to light which support the
>>> scriptures.
>>
>> Been there, done that.
>>
>Really, Robyn? What do you know about biblical
>archaeology?
Archaeology is archaeology. Why do you add the word "biblical" in
front of it? Is it some magical incantation that you think makes it
special in some way?
> What do you know about what was
>not visible in the Holy Land in the not so distant
>past?
Would you like to explain that word salad?
> I think you think that what is over there was
>always visible. It wasn't. You might want to look
>up Warren's shaft.,
Done so.
> and "the boring through." That
>was at one time doubted by the doubters. But then
>it was found and then proved to be exactly as the
>Bible says.
Wrong again! Why do you put such store by your book of fairy stories?
Warren's shaft dates from about the 18th century BC.
>>
>> Just because a place has been shown to exist, doesn't prove that your god
>> does, Suzanne. Do try to see the difference.
>>
>Your comment is a strange one. If the Bible claims that
>Jesus healed a man at a pool that had many porches,
>but they can't find the place, then doubters may not
>accept the verse. But since they fairly recently did
>find this place, and excavated it, that brings the verse
>into a prominent light and some will see that the verse
>was telling the truth,
Are the stories of Sherlock Holmes also about a true person because we
can find 221B Baker Street?
> so the find of that place is
>evidence of what is written about it,
No it isn't.
>when you find
>out that it does exist. Those of you that claim so
>loudly that you want evidence, jump over it when
>it is given to you.
You have no evidence, that is your problem.
> All the more reason why you
>should accept it on faith, rather than with what you
>claim that you want, which is evidence.
>>
>Philip was led by the Lord to speak to an Ethiopian
>eunuch who was in service to Candace the Queen.
>"Candace" is a term that is like the word "pharaoh."
>There were more than one pharaoh, and there were
>more than one Candace. Candace is spelled several
>different ways. Candace = Hendeke = Kandake.
>There is a Queen Gersamot Hendeke VII., who was
>the Queen of Ethiopia from the year 42 to 52 A.D.
>Christianity spread in Africa and by the 3rd century
>it was very prominent there, since that is when the
>Ethiopian church as the official religion was
>established there. There are an abundance of Christian
>archaeological finds in this area of Africa.
So what? What do you think they prove? Certainly not that JC existed.
>>
>>> The subject has not been on other religions, Robyn.
>>
>> You're lying, Suzanne. Or you could just be plain ignorant.
>>
>> Kansas exists - Does that mean the Wizard of Oz exists too?
>>
>You are just heckling here, Robyn.
>>
>Suzanne
>
--
Bob
--
Bob.
