Rationalists vs Irrationalists
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Rationalists vs Irrationalists         


Author: Thomas Keske
Date: Feb 24, 2008 11:40

Rationalists vs Irrationalists

The term "atheist" might not seem like a biased term,
but there is a subtle bias in it. It is a term defined
from the perspective of religionists.

Maybe the bias would be a bit more evident, if we
referred to the two camps as "godless people",
as opposed to "People of God". One sounds so
dirty, the other so wholesome. What a backwards
lie that is, as one would expect, in this upside-down world.

The roots "a" and "theos" are meaning "without" and
"deity", respectively.

From the atheist perspective, it is not the "atheist" who
is "without" something, because there is no thing that exists
that he would be capable of "lacking".

It is the religionist who is without something, and
that would be "rationality".

To be "without a thing" implicitly presupposes
the existence of the thing.
Show full article (1.29Kb)
1 Comment
Re: Rationalists vs Irrationalists         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Feb 24, 2008 14:14

On Feb 24, 11:40 am, "Thomas Keske" comcast.net> wrote:
> Rationalists vs Irrationalists
>
> The term "atheist" might not seem like a biased term,
> but there is a subtle bias in it. It is a term defined
> from the perspective of religionists.
>
> Maybe the bias would be a bit more evident, if we
> referred to the two camps as "godless people",
> as opposed to "People of God". One sounds so
> dirty, the other so wholesome. What a backwards
> lie that is, as one would expect, in this upside-down world.
>

I think that the correct way to frame the stance is "athiest" vs "free
thinker" which is like the frame of the abortion debate terminology;
"anti-abortion" vs "pro-life."
Show full article (5.17Kb)
no comments