On Jul 14, 3:15 pm, "jeannek...@
aol.com"
aol.com> wrote:> On Jul 14, 4:12 am, "Dennis M. Hammes"
arvig.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>> Religion succeeds
>>> where woman
>>> have no axes...;>
>
>> Now, why'd we hafta wade through the whole rest of the "poem" to get
>> to that, eh?
>
>> Now if you could only manage to learn that a woman with an axe is a
>> /Republican/...
>> ...that "Democrats" can be "equal" only by Taking Away Everybody's
>> Axes...
>> ...WITH WHAT?
>
>> "When Guns Are Outlawed, Only Muslims Will Have AK-47s."
>
>> --
>> -------(m+
>> ~/:o)_|
>> Illiteracy and stupidity fight to the death every day.
>> Trouble is, they breed
first.http://scrawlmark.org>
> Dennis,
>
> You are kind not to expound on my faux pas singular
> when I meant plural for women with axes...;>
>
> Haste makes...
>
> Jeanne who recalls you do not vote, safe that.
What? I don't vote?
Since when?
I don't make Xs on Holy Cards furnished by old white guys in polyester
BD dresses, no.
The only thing that actually buys you is a seat on the "jury" of a
kangaroo "court" where polyester BD dresses pop up and say, "Well, /
He/ Said...," proving only that it's hearsay and inadmissable.
But any who actually know that are "dismissed" during the "selection
process," so the X on the Holy Card isn't worth jack shit in any case.
The only spot in court ever worth a tinker's toot in a tornado is
the spot where the Devil ("/adversus/") "appears" (because he was
"summoned").
I tell people shit like "Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental" and
"Servants do not pay taxes in any venue under any circumstances."
Any who can't make use of those weapons, well, their Xs don't really
"count," either.
(Nothing personal, Xs don't count unless o.p's negative numbers
constitute a binding onus on the positive
-- oh, wait, that's
"Commonw... ah, "Democrat," innit.)
