> On Jul 14, 11:44 am, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:
>
>
>

>> jeannek...@aol.com wrote:

>>> I used HillaryClinton.com ago and found several chat and blog sites
>>> then. Did you find Obama's?

>

>> I didnt even look. I post a lot on usenet, and figured that if any of my
>> questions resonated, someone would pass them along. I've also written to
>> my senators and congressman, even in snailmail, and only gotten standard
>> form replies with no indication whatever that any staffer read any.

>

>> I guess I know enuf about Janis' studies on Group Think to see I'm too
>> far out of the box for any of the politicians to deal with. Gibbon:
>> "Romans all believed relgion was true, Philosophers all thot religion
>> was false, Politicians all knew religion was useful." My religion has
>> not been useful.

>

>> One of my beliefs is that we dont really have a functional democracy
>> because we dont really have a rationally functional electorate. But I
>> thot, as a Stoic Brahman, it was my duty to give it a shot.

>

>>> Have you seen Bugliosi's book on charging Bush with Murder re: iraq

>

>>  > deaths? He has a solid case, neat premise, too. Better than
>>  > Elizabeth Holzman's impeach book.
>> No, and dont really think they matter any more. The next president
>> will be lucky if he has the time to formulate policy to let us all move
>> on, and back away from the brink of economic collapse.

>

>>> B&N are on line.

>

>> Just bookmarked that. But have some kind of credit with Amazon, so I'll
>> take a look at that acct. first.  please email me your home address.
>> Kharma being what it is, my house number is the very same as that of a
>> book by Orwell I am sure you know of. My street is Kirkendoll rd. The
>> town is Clinton in the same state as Hillary's husband, and the zip is
>> seventwozerothreeone.

>

>> I must say your analysis of Somali and other Islamic cultures has a
>> certain poetic justice in explaining why they need to mutilate, but I
>> think the field studies of primates is better documented regarding the
>> behavior of alpha males and the associated hormone levels.

>

>> Simply put, their balls are bigger than their brains. Alpha males have
>> produced great works for the benefit of all mankind, but that happens
>> only when the alpha is endowed with superior intelligence. However, we
>> see how they just cant keep in their pants when with a sexy airhead.

>

>> All thru the 5000 years of history we can see how they regarded the womb
>> as no more than the room for their seed to grow, and in southern regions
>> more often shipped out the more challenging young women to nunneries.

>

>> I dont claim that the ragheads would satisfy the CIA sexual service
>> providers. And now that you mention it, can see how they'd havta be
>> trained with kugels and horseback riding in order to provide the most
>> memorable experience to those men to get their cooperation. Altho, with
>> the rich guys having 4 wives and however concubines, there's lotsa poor
>> ones who've never had any pussy at all, so a larger cunt wont matter.

>

>>> My atheist/humanist self is descended from Irish women warriors...

>

>> I just finished another book on the Celts. Everyone knows about the
>> hill forts, but its only been recently that C-14 and dendochronology has
>> dated them. There's a curious cycle where an area has hill forts for a
>> couple hundred years, then they are all abandoned. Barford, 'The Early
>> Slavs' inadvertently provides a clue with reports of the discovery of
>> tiny cabins that were built when they could be hidden in the bush.

>

>> We also have the DNA markers for Cholera and Dysentery. So, since the
>> warrior class disdained good hygiene, which was the purview of the
>> witches, epidemics would break out, and everyone would flee, picking a
>> place in the forest away from contagion. Their kids would survive, so as
>> Barford reports, the next generation builds a couple more cabins. Three
>> generations later, its a village, then a town, then a rich target, and
>> it is back to hill forts.

>

>> So there were cycles between when warrior prowess mattered, and then
>> when the health services of witches and midwives did. I've gone onto the
>> "survivalists" lists making the point that if they are going to rebuild
>> the pioneer lifestyle and have a dozen sons, they better find some
>> midwives. The silence has just been deafening.

>

>> When the men went "a viking", they had been living polyamorously in
>> communal longhouses, and armed the women to defend themselves. You cant
>> do that very effectively for just a single wife alone at home. The blade
>> under the mattress is not nearly as effective as having others to take
>> turns minding the fire and do the nitewatch. The later, when the manor
>> hall came in, yes the Lord and his lady had their own bedroom, but all
>> the others fucked around all night with whoever.

>

>> Even in "Life in a medieval village" whose landlord was an abbot, they
>> were still mostly promiscuous; some couples jumped the broom for a year
>> and a day as pagans had always done, but few paid for a priest to get
>> officially married. The widow of the miller used sexual services to pay
>> the boys to move the grain around.

>

>> One time the Abbot tried to raise taxes; way back in the 13th century,
>> they knew how to organize a strike, and everyone picked up and moved
>> into the forest. He caved. They could not have done that in the Levant
>> or Africa; the warmer winters meant people could move around all year.
>> It also meant that food was available all year, and if you didnt have
>> enuf, the next tribe wasnt to far for a raid. They needed aggressive
>> warriors in the gene pool, and now they are all still stuck with them.

>
> Day Brown,
>
> The book is in the AM mail. I re-used an envelope from Free Inquiry
> because
> I am thrifty and frugal aka cheap.*
>
> Amazon is still charging the higher price. Instead I recommend a book
> by a friend of mine: Sheryl McGinnis titled: I Am Your Disease to
> apply
> your credit thereto. She is completing a second book because her
> English
> teaching in HS husband retired and thus she has more time to finish
> it.
> They lost their son Scott to drugs ago and the book is worth reading,
> imo.
>
> btw our genes seem to include an aversion to HIV/AIDs post the plague
> if what I read is true and if the fat fellow tres gay who escaped such
> is
> correct. Neat that, whot?  Now listen, Day, how could you have such
> interesting stories and not be a Hillary hound? We who have summas
> and foiled the demographic students and twits who classified us as a
> type of Hillary voter laughed lots, but we knew Stuart, JR and others
> like my beloved spouse aka BS whose brains overruled their beliefs
> aka groupy-tendencies were in our company.
>
> *btw David doctored the envelope and inadvertently used his return
> address
> because my labels are mixed with his...;> Ah, intimacy of the married
> state.
>
> Read on!
>
> Jeanne