>
>
>"On The Highways and Bi-Ways God Built" Yahoo.com> wrote in
>message news:g5bnbf030sr@drn.newsguy.com...

>> In article giganews.com>, ggamble
>> says...

>>>
>>>
>>>aol.com> wrote in message
>>>news:5cebf9a3-9fdf-4797-8e92-a6022841dbcf@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>Her following is larger than msm may know. On several lists I see many
>>>of all ages
>>>who are still appalled about the outcome, but that was pre-ordained,
>>>imo. Zero
>>>probability of a woman as president, imo.
>>>
>>>
>>>**Jeanne,
>>>
>>>With all due respect:
>>>
>>>When the primary process started, I supported Hillary.
>>>She lost the nomination process because:
>>>
>>>1) She ran a terrible and disorganized campaign. She consistently changed
>>>her message due to the wrangling with her senior campaign advisors which
>>>finally resulted in the firing of many of those advisors.
>>>
>>>2) No one could put a muzzle on Bill. Her campaign was effectively over
>>>when Bill made the Jesse Jackson remark in South Carolina.
>>>
>>>3) The vote on Iraq which you mentioned in your previous post.
>>>

>>
>> 4) the rather silly an always moronically tragic element of the Dem party
>> voted
>> in a figure that all the very silliest of Dem splinter groups projected
>> their
>> silliest of beliefs in. Obama had a great ability to be all things to all
>> people
>> and never really anything of substance.
>>
>> and now we see that he's more than willing to throw anything and
>> everything
>> under the bus for his own advancement.
>>
>> which does not make him the "different" politician, the politician of
>> "change,",
>> it makes him a very run of the mill politician, and from the events of the
>> last
>> few weeks, not a very good one.
>>
>> i've seen nothing that tells me with profound confidence that Obama can
>> beat
>> McCain. you are cocooned in the embrace of the American media and false
>> electoral math, Gary! wake up and smell the coffee of middle America.
>> that's
>> where he needs to win, and that's where he's in trouble.
>>
>> Obama is Michael Dukkakis and John Kerry, Gary, not JFK. and even with
>> JFK, if
>> Big Daddy Joseph P.K. hadn't spent all that money in Texas and Illinois,
>> JFK
>> would probably have retired as the junior senator from MA 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>>
>> Most Sincerely,
>>
>> GodBuilt
>>
>>
>> --
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> "I am a false prophet and God is a superstition.." "Again!"
>>
>> There Will Be Blood

>
>
>
>The question was posed by someone: How will the Democrats manage to fuck
>this one up?

>By reading all this, I think we have our answer.

>The candidate can't even energize his base. But then, McCain can't energize
>his base either, apparently he's not Conservative enough. jesus fuck.

>So, we'll see how this all pans out. The Rovian wing of the fear party will
>crank out their usual while the Democrats collectively fall on their swords.
>Wonderful.

>No wait! Why does the Republican hate/fear machine even need to bother to
>get cranked up? They should just stand back and watch the Hillary
>supporters do their dirty work for them. The Republicans must be laughing
>their collective asses off. Every time one of you uses the term
>*flip-flop*, you should nod to Karl Rove. In fact, this whole hysteria
>about flip flopping is pretty fucked in the first place, don't ya'll think?

>Scurry on down and look at someone's voting record or off the cuff
>utterances at some whistle stop eight years ago to try to find some gotcha
>discrepancy on some issue no matter how trivial and Behold! This Person Has
>Flip Flopped! They aren't steadfast and resolute in their beliefs. They may
>have adapted to current conditions and reassessed the situation and changed
>their mind on something. Jesus Fuck! We can't have that! In order to be a
>successful public figure, one must stick with the first position one ever
>held on every single issue and Never Ever Change That Position Ever, lest
>they be labeled a dreaded flip-flopper. Wonderful. Really.

>I wish your glorious leader George W Bush had flip-flopped a little more in
>regard to some of his disastrous positions. But no, he's resolute and
>steadfast in his positions, yes sireee. There's no fucken way he's going to
>reassess a situation and modify his position in the face of new
>developments.

>But I digress. We shouldn't speak of issues, or the crimes committed by the
>current administration, or the deficit they created, or the fact that the
>next administration might get to appoint a few scotus justices, or the price
>of gas, or the upcoming eruption of the commodities markets, no, we need to
>rip the only chance we have to actually govern a new asshole because he
>isn't Bill Clinton, or because he has a wing-nut for a spiritual advisor, or
>because he's too young, or because he moved his campaign headquarters closer
>to where he lives, or because he isn't street smart enough, or because he's
>too street smart, or because his wife is brilliant.

>By all means, don't examine what has possibly been the most disastrous
>administration in the history of the United States. Concentrate your efforts
>on trashing the only person who could possibly fix what has happened over
>the last eight years.

>So, let's hear some predictions regarding what the Republican hate and fear
>machine is going to trot out this time.

>1) Will they try gay marriage again?

>2) Will they get the Israelis to bomb Iran?

>3) Maybe they reprise the old J.Edgar Hoover/MLK playbook, that was good for
>a barrel of laughs.

>Insert your predictions here.

>
>
>
>