On Jun 19, 6:35 pm, "jeannek...@
aol.com"
aol.com> wrote:> Amanda,
>
> Have never used Maya as a model. She was one of several
> women I noticed who dared to endorse Hillary despite
> the pressure many men gave into to change their stance, i.e.,
> John Lewis.
>
> Whoopi Goldberg, Maxine Waters, Stephanie Tubbs-Jones,
> Judge Judy and other women I admire were pro-Hillary while
> the MSNBC/WP/Newsweek smear took off and gagged me.
>
> Maya stayed loyal until released by Hillary to support Obama
> post his receiving 59 delegates via Michigan/DNC which so
> surprised me as it effectively put him over the top count-wise.
>
> Hillary had joshed about hoping the filly won. Her wearing
> pants seems practical given the hours and how ankles swell
> in the heat, as I've noticed of late..;> Obama adorers are
> believers; I am not a believer, but prefer street savvy broads
> with brains and backbone when I hire the competent vice
> those with simple charisma. Able poets who recall wheelbarrows
> may be succinct and dismissive of those of us who merely
> witness and make notes. We who exchanged our lives for money
> are careful about what we buy; we vote with our money; some
> prefer the able to the ministers wowing crowds for presiding parts.
>
> I do not want women to get rings and roses. I want them to rule.
Too bad.
I'm here to see that they don't.
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist within the
United States nor any place subject to their jurisdiction."
This is rather in contradistinction to the usual mode rule by women,
i.e., voluntary servitude, or, as Rusty Warren put it around 1964,
"Knockers Up!" (the album may still be available).
I.e., any woman who would run for President in this age of DuPont
and Victoria's Secret is /too stupid/ (not to mention probably too
misogynistic) to be President.
>
> Your exhortation was clever. If I were a poet, I'd see red...;>
It's the roses...
(...which is a reference to the neck-wreath of roses got by the
winning nag at the Kentucky Derby / Desecrat/Repooplican Conventions
etc. Too bad that winning a horse race only proves you're a horse --
as winning the Presidency only proves you're a servant, eh, wot?)
>
> Jeanne
>
> On Jun 8, 11:26 pm, Amanda Reid
arvig.net> wrote:
>>> On Jun 8, 5:21 pm, "jeannek...@
aol.com"
aol.com> wrote:>
>>> Racing Forms
>
>>> The Derby death of Eight Bells, a filly,
>>> three years of age, favored by Hillary,
>>> caused my superstitious self to sense
>>> broken legs forced forward on a fast track
>>> mean: certain euthanasia ends that race.
>
>>> Big Brown won that Derby and The Preakness,
>>> but a cracked left hoof, well patched by greedy
>>> fellows focused on the Triple Crown, failed
>>> to deliver as promised; Big Brown lost
>>> The Belmont Stakes and came in as dead last.
>
>>> Brown's handlers can't explain why he faltered;
>>> the jockey said he felt he had no horse
>>> when he spurred him to seize an opening;
>>> Brown's "can do" became a slow "no, thank, you"
>>> thus, Brown enters history books for tracks.
>
>>> Unlike the fast filly in the Derby,
>>> Big Brown has a future, as a sire;
>>> unlike Hillary who stepped down today,
>>> Barack has a future, post that wire
>>> where a winner's circle has a White House.
>
>>> But winning depends upon the absence
>>> of cracked hooves well patched by greedy fellows
>>> and the woman who suspended her run for roses
>>> (a ring in the circle where women need not apply)
>>> who knows how to rise on call as Maya has written.
>
>>> Jeanne Khan
>>> 7 June 2008
>
>> But writing depends upon the absence
>> of cracked records bubblegummed by girls
>> who want women to get rings and roses
>> for wearing pants.
>
>> Jeanne,
>> so long as you use Maya as a model
>> you'll never sell the rags.- Hide quoted text -
>
>> - Show quoted text -
