> Questions and Answers
>
> We know there are more questions than answers, yet we
> content ourselves with the limited answers served to us.
>
> The same answer for all those unexplored questions. Answers
> acting as labels for all which don't quite fit our forced
> blueprints.
>
> The same answers used to satisfy our disquiet. Our psyche,
> at war with itself, in a quandary cause by accepting what
> barely seems credible. The unconscious fighting for better
> answers, than those which occupy our conscious minds.
>
> These limited answers satisfy a belief in our purposeful
> misconceptions. Non-answers only equal to our confounded
> states. Non-answers as the source of our confounded states.
> Answers adapted from the illusions we sell ourselves.
>
> We will know it when we see it, or so we believe. Having
> accepted the answer, we now look to find its mate, all
> those unasked questions converging on the few answers we
> allow ourselves.
>
> We will know them when we see them, said as the answer
> demands its use, unsatisfactory resolution for our many
> conflicts. A focus binding all the unknowns, all those
> neurological states which refuse to sit well with our
> lazy models. Answers as self-satisfying, self-deluding
> expressions, constructs serving the necessary function of
> answers yet being far from adequate.
>
> That acceptance of the standard answer can be our undoing.
> The absence of better answers, or better questions, can trick
> us into a state of unsound reason. It is only with the truth
> filled answer that we heal ourselves. Knowing what ills us
> can cure us.
>
> So lazy are our answers, that we might as well not have
> language. Those answers barely satisfy as grunts. The barked
> expression, the ill fitting expletive, conjured to solve the
> puzzles which occupy our perplexed states. The tongue needing
> something to say, not content with the questions, with which
> it might play.
>
> What is it, why is it, how is it? Questions which won't always
> have answers, but show us still thinking, with a place reserved
> by the question for better answers.
>
> What, why, how?
>
> Seen from another perspective, some of our answers point to another
> era. Their use again, connecting now and then, the commonality of
> those non-answers, their renewed currency, harking back to a time
> of equal profundity. Beyond meaning, the shared expression, the
> same vague labels, the same shared states.
>
> If we look hard enough to truly notice, we might see these common
> phrases with this other function. In the mean time we content ourselves
> with the answers fashion from our experiences, answers borrowed from
> culture. We will know it when we see. So we are fooled and are mad
> fools.