Quantum age version of "I think therefor I am"
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Quantum age version of "I think therefor I am"         


Author: Brian Fletcher
Date: Mar 25, 2008 08:08

...could well come out, "what I think is what I get".

The work of Ramachandran on neuro linguistic programming, and visual imigary
impact, amongst other eminent scientists, would validate such a view.

His recent demonstration regarding phantom pain was a perfect example.

BOfL
29 Comments
Re: Quantum age version of "I think therefor I am"         


Author: ta
Date: Mar 25, 2008 10:59

On Mar 25, 11:08 am, "Brian Fletcher" gmail.com> wrote:
> ...could well come out, "what I think is what I get".

So if I continue to think about green unicorns munching hay in my
living room, they will eventually appear?
> The work of Ramachandran on neuro linguistic programming, and visual imigary
> impact, amongst other eminent scientists, would validate such a view.
>
> His recent demonstration regarding phantom pain was a perfect example.
>
> BOfL
no comments
Re: Quantum age version of "I think therefor I am"         


Author: Milan
Date: Mar 25, 2008 18:24

"Brian Fletcher" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:47e91564$0$14479$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> ...could well come out, "what I think is what I get".
>
> The work of Ramachandran on neuro linguistic programming, and visual
> imigary impact, amongst other eminent scientists, would validate such a
> view.
>
> His recent demonstration regarding phantom pain was a perfect example.
>
> BOfL

Visual imigary is the future. Or is it lisuav rygamia? Or maybe is it vlisua
marigiayh? Anyway, the work of Chandramadhdhd s a fectper emaxple. We
tanhsssk Bnrain for the ptsot.

rgesdra

Nilam
no comments
Re: Quantum age version of "I think therefor I am"         


Author: Omniqueryous
Date: Mar 25, 2008 19:36

On Mar 25, 10:59 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 11:08 am, "Brian Fletcher" gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ...could well come out, "what I think is what I get".
>
> So if I continue to think about green unicorns munching hay in my
> living room, they will eventually appear?

If you "think" illusion, you "get" illusion -- alright, so you might
possibly start to see things, hallucinations, as a result of thinking
that overly assiduously.

Also, thinking of moneybags too much may similarly cause hallucinatory
wishful thinking; while thinking of real-life plans in decent and
realistic detail, may give you realistic preparation to achieve those.

The info. age version might be, "I think therefore I am _prepared_."
Show full article (1.04Kb)
no comments
Re: Quantum age version of "I think therefor I am"         


Author: Omniqueryous
Date: Mar 25, 2008 20:00

On Mar 26, 6:24 am, "Milan" yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Brian Fletcher" gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:47e91564$0$14479$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>> ...could well come out, "what I think is what I get".
>
>> The work of Ramachandran on neuro linguistic programming, and visual
>> imigary impact, amongst other eminent scientists,  would validate such a
>> view.
>
>> His recent demonstration regarding phantom pain was a perfect example.
>
>> BOfL
>
> Visual imigary is the future. Or is it lisuav rygamia? Or maybe is it vlisua
> marigiayh? Anyway, the work of Chandramadhdhd s a fectper emaxple.  We
> tanhsssk Bnrain for the ptsot.
>
> rgesdra ...
Show full article (0.85Kb)
no comments
Re: Quantum age version of "I think therefor I am"         


Author: Sean
Date: Mar 25, 2008 20:15

"Milan" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64tmu9F2cru7aU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "Brian Fletcher" gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:47e91564$0$14479$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>> ...could well come out, "what I think is what I get".
>>
>> The work of Ramachandran on neuro linguistic programming, and visual
>> imigary impact, amongst other eminent scientists, would validate such a
>> view.
>>
>> His recent demonstration regarding phantom pain was a perfect example.
>>
>> BOfL
>
> Visual imigary is the future. Or is it lisuav rygamia? Or maybe is it
> vlisua marigiayh? Anyway, the work of Chandramadhdhd s a fectper emaxple.
> We tanhsssk Bnrain for the ptsot.
>
> rgesdra ...
Show full article (1.00Kb)
no comments
Re: Quantum age version of "I think therefor I am"         


Author: Roy Jose Lorr
Date: Mar 26, 2008 05:31

Omniqueryous wrote:

"I think therefore I am _prepared_."

Do you think you are prepared to think, and if so, by whom?
no comments
Re: Quantum age version of "I think therefor I am"         


Author: Brian Fletcher
Date: Mar 26, 2008 05:37

"Sean" bro.org> wrote in message
news:47e9bfc6$0$17201$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Milan" yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:64tmu9F2cru7aU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> "Brian Fletcher" gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:47e91564$0$14479$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> ...could well come out, "what I think is what I get".
>>>
>>> The work of Ramachandran on neuro linguistic programming, and visual
>>> imigary impact, amongst other eminent scientists, would validate such a
>>> view.
>>>
>>> His recent demonstration regarding phantom pain was a perfect example.
>>>
>>> BOfL
>>
>> Visual imigary is the future. Or is it lisuav rygamia? Or maybe is it
>> vlisua marigiayh? Anyway, the work of Chandramadhdhd s a fectper emaxple. ...
Show full article (1.77Kb)
no comments
Re: Quantum age version of "I think therefor I am"         


Author: Brian Fletcher
Date: Mar 26, 2008 05:48

"Omniqueryous" emailaccount.com> wrote in message
news:981975d0-1743-4a97-84d8-b2c5997f1308@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 6:24 am, "Milan" yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Brian Fletcher" gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:47e91564$0$14479$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>> ...could well come out, "what I think is what I get".
>
>> The work of Ramachandran on neuro linguistic programming, and visual
>> imigary impact, amongst other eminent scientists, would validate such a
>> view.
>
>> His recent demonstration regarding phantom pain was a perfect example.
>
>> BOfL
>
> Visual imigary is the future. Or is it lisuav rygamia? Or maybe is it
> vlisua
> marigiayh? Anyway, the work of Chandramadhdhd s a fectper emaxple. We ...
Show full article (1.16Kb)
no comments
Re: Quantum age version of "I think therefor I am"         


Author: Brian Fletcher
Date: Mar 26, 2008 06:04

"Omniqueryous" emailaccount.com> wrote in message
news:243c1948-e6d5-4844-921f-1a636175064f@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 25, 10:59 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 11:08 am, "Brian Fletcher" gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ...could well come out, "what I think is what I get".
>
> So if I continue to think about green unicorns munching hay in my
> living room, they will eventually appear?

***What do you mean by 'green unicorns'?

If you "think" illusion, you "get" illusion -- alright, so you might
possibly start to see things, hallucinations, as a result of thinking
that overly assiduously.

***We have a different interpretation of illusion. The most common form Im
referring to is exemplified in the example "suffer now for future
reward'"where the dominating reality in life becomes suffering and reward is
always in the future.

.
Show full article (1.68Kb)
no comments
1 2 3