Re: Q:- for lovers
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Q:- for lovers         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Nic
Date: Sep 15, 2008 10:00

On 14 Sep, 04:37, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 13, 4:55 pm, Nic hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> whats the cutest GF you're ever likely to have had or gotten a hold of
>> now and can we see her pictures pleeeeeaaaasssseee???? cos we do
>> graphics and we want to really really want to see what the real world
>> throbs about? LOL!

I was thinking of some old movie icons, and how well they
were matched for the scenes, some people are devastatingly
hansome, attractive, witty kind or intelligent but perhaps if
you, or they, wernt with together with the very same backdrops etc,
perhaps it wouldnt kindle the same instincts, I say perhaps due
to knowing someone who wasnt particulary physically attractive
or clever or intelligent, but damn, I am certain whatever situation
whatever career, or whatever languages spoken the attraction
was minus 1, mutually exclusive magnetic and dull, and you never
know why? conspicuously uninspiring? but attractive because
of some unique and memorable quality in their manner or instances
in passing.....maybe you want to go back to check them out?
then realize a few years on it was a shop mannequin
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!