| Re: "Psychiatry". Should Philosophy have a say in it? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Robert CohenRobert Cohen Date: Apr 12, 2008 08:46
On Apr 12, 11:10Â am, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:
> re: what's philosophical about the subject matter?
>
> Imho, as a "subjectivist," I (albeit simplistically) perceive:
>
> Dr. Fraud (if you hate him) or Dr. Freud (if you accept his insights)
> is the antithesis of my forebearers' Judaism and others.
>
> It's  both openly & "unconsciuosly" communicated that F is the
> nemesis, Â devil, pervert, deviate, anti-christ and subversive to what
> traditional good and godly civilization holds dear.
>
> Dr. Carl Jung, the  major rival guru or anti-Freudian school of their
> day, was apparently celebrated & approved by the medico, politico and
> religio establishmenst & authorities.
>
> Because what Freud "philosophizes" as human reality is indeed shocking
> to this very day of "decay"/excess
>
> Wake-up and pisss, the world is still on fire, because today's
> Talibanism seemingly represents that regressive, reactionary pre-Freud
> ideal
Caveat, libertines, Freud acknowledges:
"repression is the price paid for civilization"
|