|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: awais.nazir.chawais.nazir.ch Date: May 23, 2008 16:30
SECULAR EVIDENCE (THAT GOD EXISTS):
reference: en.wikipedia.com
First-life on earth emerged about 4 billion years ago, as fossil
records suggest.
That proto-DNA has to meet the following four conditions,
simultaneously, or the proto-DNA is dead:
-organic compounds joined in exact helical order.
-have a complete reproductive system.
-have a complete DNA-repair system.
-have a complete metabolic system.
Even if the proto-DNA met the previous impossibility, mutation will
immediately kill that proto-DNA. Most mutations are
neutral, very little mutations are harmful, and very very little
mutations are useful:
-What is the chance that that proto-DNA have the favourable mutation
and not the harmful mutation, before reproducing? almost impossible.
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
|
| | 10 Comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: May 23, 2008 17:24
On May 23, 4:30 pm, awais.nazir...@ gmail.com wrote: > SECULAR EVIDENCE (THAT GOD EXISTS):
>
> reference: en.wikipedia.com
>
> First-life on earth emerged about 4 billion years ago, as fossil
> records suggest.
>
> That proto-DNA has to meet the following four conditions,
> simultaneously, or the proto-DNA is dead:
> -organic compounds joined in exact helical order.
> -have a complete reproductive system.
> -have a complete DNA-repair system.
> -have a complete metabolic system.
>
> Even if the proto-DNA met the previous impossibility, mutation will
> immediately kill that proto-DNA. Most mutations are
>
|
| Show full article (3.97Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Daniel T.Daniel T. Date: May 23, 2008 17:29
> -What is the chance that that proto-DNA have the favourable mutation
> and not the harmful mutation, before reproducing? almost impossible.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Mark K. BilboMark K. Bilbo Date: May 23, 2008 18:50
> SECULAR EVIDENCE (THAT GOD EXISTS):
And that about wraps that up...
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Reverend DaveReverend Dave Date: May 23, 2008 21:01
> Attn OP , Please be aware that no amount of scientific evidence or
> types...will ever be enough for an Atheist who doesnt want the
> personal Creator to exist. Its because its not about them requiring
> evidence ; its about thier WILL to not surrender authority of thier
> lives --- not even to the Universes Creator who owns them. The
> philosophical bias of atheists is such that they already have thier
> mind made up on this issue
All you would need to do is provise some verfiable scientific evidence
that God exists. Since all you, and your friends in faith ever do is
attempt to disprove evolution and the big bang you've accomplished
nothing. Even if you could disprove the big bang or evolution or the age
of the earth (4.5 billion years) it still doesn't prove that God exists.
> , and Theism, the Christian Faith, Christians, Christian websites,
> The Bible, and evidence for all of the above... must NEVER be
> entertained.
Well the Bible is entertaining, if you like stories about rape, murder,
genocide, mysogeny, incest and the like.
|
| Show full article (2.90Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Uncle VicUncle Vic Date: May 23, 2008 21:30
One fine day in alt.atheism, awais.nazir.ch@ gmail.com wrote:
> SECULAR EVIDENCE (THAT GOD EXISTS):
>
>
> reference: en.wikipedia.com
>
> First-life on earth emerged about 4 billion years ago, as fossil
> records suggest.
>
> That proto-DNA has to meet the following...
|
| Show full article (2.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Preventer of WorkPreventer of Work Date: May 23, 2008 22:16
Daniel T. wrote:
>> -What is the chance that that proto-DNA have the favourable mutation
>> and not the harmful mutation, before reproducing? almost impossible.
To a godder it is because of the argument from "I can't imagine how".
Therefore, as we all know, Goddidit.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: May 23, 2008 22:22
>> share their biological functions with chimpanzees more than they share
>> with other species.
>> - Archeologisgts have no proof, that the socalled human-fossil-
>> records, are of either monkeys or proto-humans.
>
> I'm not aware of that, but science is not my speciality. But here's
> something I do know:
>
> Archeologists have no proof anyone has ever risen from the dead, or that
> anyone named "Jesus" was the son of any god thing, or even existed at
> all.
>
> The notion that a wandering preacher by that name existed 2000 years ago
> comes from a holy book full of scientific errors and absurdities.
>
> The fossil evidence for evolution is bountiful. The evidence for your
> god thing is nigh. The god thing's Word puts Man at the beginning of
> creation, ignoring what we know now through fossil evidence and
> archeology, instead reflecting the knowledge of man some 2500 years ago.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.72Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: ZerkonXZerkonX Date: May 24, 2008 04:47
On Fri, 23 May 2008 16:30:25 -0700, awais.nazir.ch wrote:
> -To make the previous impossibilities, into possibilites, god-thing is
> required.
What is a "god-thing"?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
