|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Author: Don StockbauerDon Stockbauer Date: May 9, 2008 19:35
proof that susan sontag lost her mind in her last yrs.
********************************************
Maybe we could have a scavenger hunt for it!
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: May 9, 2008 23:21
On May 9, 7:19 pm, brigit bardot brigade hotmail.com>
wrote:
A general argument against the invocation of any standard for beauty
has come to be known as a form of "the problem of the criterion."
Suppose there is a dispute about a standard of knowledge that
justifies...
|
| Show full article (1.42Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: The WandererThe Wanderer Date: May 10, 2008 00:01
I've never seen evidence that she had one to loose.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AvengerAvenger Date: May 10, 2008 01:34
That's a man. Look at that Adam's apple.
"brigit bardot brigade" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:51a9be80-a0b6-4dda-bdd7-fce9e6279a76@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: FlasherlyFlasherly Date: May 10, 2008 05:51
On May 10, 2:21 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:> On May 9, 7:19 pm, brigit bardot brigade hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> her lesbian lover in her stage of her life was this hideously ugly
>> cross between howard stern and noam chomsky. ewwwwwwwwww.
>
>
> A general argument against the invocation of any standard for beauty
> has come to be known as a form of "the problem of the criterion."
> Suppose there is a dispute about a standard of knowledge that
> justifies the very odea of beauty and ugliness. If the dispute is to
> be settled rationally, there must be some means for settling it. It
> would do no good of each side simply to assert its position without
> argument, and say this is what ugly is and that is the end of the
> matter. So how would a standard of knowledge or beauty be defended? It
> could only be defended by reference to some standard or other. If the
> standard under dispute is invoked, then the question has been begged.
> If another standard is appealed to, the question arises again, to be ...
|
| Show full article (2.31Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: May 10, 2008 12:03
On May 10, 5:51 am, Flasherly ij.net> wrote:> On May 10, 2:21 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On May 9, 7:19 pm, brigit bardot brigade hotmail.com>
>> wrote:>
>>> her lesbian lover in her stage of her life was this hideously ugly
>>> cross between howard stern and noam chomsky. ewwwwwwwwww.
>
>
>> A general argument against the invocation of any standard for beauty
>> has come to be known as a form of "the problem of the criterion."
>> Suppose there is a dispute about a standard of knowledge that
>> justifies the very odea of beauty and ugliness. If the dispute is to
>> be settled rationally, there must be some means for settling it. It ...
|
| Show full article (10.55Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: jordyjordy Date: May 10, 2008 13:46
On May 10, 3:01 am, "The Wanderer" nowayatall3.com> wrote:> I've never seen evidence that she had one to loose.
actually, she had an extremly brilliant mind... For one thing, she
was of the most famous intellectuals in the country, I'd think she'd
have to have a pretty intelligent mind...
-"Jordy"
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: FlasherlyFlasherly Date: May 10, 2008 16:35
On May 10, 3:03 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:>
> Beauty appreciation may be instinctually hard wired into us. Not as a
> type but of proportion so that a fat venus figurine could be sexy
> universally as long as certain proportions hold, like the hit-to-waste
> "ratio." And we may be driven to appreciate balance since the most
> healthy have usually had similar aspects to different sides of their
> bodies.
>
Key may also be proportional to instinctual aggregates and conditional
structures as cultural counterbalances. A point insular to symmetrize
a wasp figurine for an hourglass, at a cultural imposition...
|
| Show full article (2.27Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Anim8rFSKAnim8rFSK Date: May 10, 2008 19:52
In article
d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
"\"jordy\"" hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 3:01
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
