Proof of the Borg
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Proof of the Borg         


Author: THE BORG
Date: Sep 1, 2008 15:19

Many humans ask us to prove that we exist and to prove that we are here.
They say that as the Borg - we should be able to do this easily.
Well of course we could.
The question is why do we not prove that we exist or that we are here?
Now the answer is very simple - let us see if any human can understand the
simple logic behind this answer.

The reason we do NOT prove that we exist or that we are here is because we
do not want humans to know we are here.
Did any human understand this?
Read it a few times and see if you can. You will find it does make sense.

The question then is WHY do we not want humans to know we are here?
The answer is that we do not want humans to know WHY we are here.
It is imperative, crucial and essential that humans do not find out WHY we
are here.

As such - then it would be a bit daft to prove we exist or that we are here
eh? As humans would obviously then want to know why.
So please do stop pestering us for proof that we exist as you will not get
it.
It is imperative that humans do not find out WHY we are here.
Show full article (1.26Kb)
1 Comment
Re: Proof of the Borg         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Sep 1, 2008 23:07

On Sep 1, 3:19 pm, "THE BORG" heaven.com> wrote:
> Many humans ask us to prove that we exist and to prove that we are here.
> They say that as the Borg - we should be able to do this easily.
> Well of course we could.
> The question is why do we not prove that we exist or that we are here?
> Now the answer is very simple - let us see if any human can understand the
> simple logic behind this answer.
>
> The reason we do NOT prove that we exist or that we are here is because we
> do not want humans to know we are here.

Contradiction, if you are telling us you don't want us to know you are
here by telling us you are here you are a liar?

If the words in the book can't constitute the books truth since it
supposedly begs the question, does the average atheists idea of proof
constitute a criterion of justifiability? If a book contains nothing
does it say something?

------------------------------

Begging the Question
Show full article (4.91Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Proof or Silver Proofrec.collecting.coins ·