EVIDENCE 5 - GENES:

0 HE, INTERNATIONAL, (or 10,000 BC): Possible "socalled" extinction of
socalled last close human relatives. (It is reality, that even
Archeologists find it difficult to find a transition between human-
like animals before 0 HE (10,000 BC) and humans after 0 HE (10,000
BC); that's why they don't say it for sure but they say that is is
"possible").

12000 HE (or 2000 AD): Current research has established that human
beings are genetically highly homogenous, that is the DNA of
individuals is more alike than usual for most species. (Chimpanzees/
etc have highly hetrogenous genes, and only humans have highly
homogenous genes. This can't be a chance, humans came to earth very
recently, that is the reason of their genetic homogenousity, i.e. much
much less mutation. Chimps had lived on Earth many millions of years
ago, that's the reason they have hetrogenous genes, or many many
mutations). Thus, Humans must have a single parent which are not
monkeys, because if humans have inherited the Chimpanzee gene then the
human gene should also have been hetrogenous.

EVIDENCE 5 - GENES:

0 HE, INTERNATIONAL, (or 10,000 BC): Possible "socalled" extinction of
socalled last close human relatives. (It is reality, that even
Archeologists find it difficult to find a transition between human-
like animals before 0 HE (10,000 BC) and humans after 0 HE (10,000
BC); that's why they don't say it for sure but they say that is is
"possible").

12000 HE (or 2000 AD): Current research has established that human
beings are genetically highly homogenous, that is the DNA of
individuals is more alike than usual for most species. (Chimpanzees/
etc have highly hetrogenous genes, and only humans have highly
homogenous genes. This can't be a chance, humans came to earth very
recently, that is the reason of their genetic homogenousity, i.e. much
much less mutation. Chimps had lived on Earth many millions of years
ago, that's the reason they have hetrogenous genes, or many many
mutations). Thus, Humans must have a single parent which are not
monkeys, because if humans have inherited the Chimpanzee gene then the
human gene should also have been hetrogenous.

EVIDENCE 6 - EXTINCTION:

0 HE, INTERNATIONAL, (or 10,000 BC): Past Wars were not the factor
limiting human population. Even if almost all population was killed,
then the remnants will again grow in strength, till the food can
support the population. FOOD LIMITS THE POPULATION, NOT WARS.

2000 HE, INTERNATIONAL, (or 8,000 BC): first signs of deforestoration/
agriculture were found. FIRST HUMAN WAS BOTH HUNTER/FARMER.

4800 HE, EUROPE, (or 5200 BC): Beginning of human inhabitation and
settlements in Malta. THUS HUMAN IS VERY RECENT IN THIS WORLD;
INTELLIGENCE AS HUMAN'S DON'T SAY TO SIT AT ONE PLACE.

6000 HE, EGYPT (or 4000 BC): increase in Egyptian population, thus
larger villages. THE SUDDEN RISE IN POPULATION MEANS HUMANITY IS
RECENT.

On May 13, 10:36 pm, Awais Nazir gmail.com> wrote:

(THIS MASSIVE
EXTICTION , IS FIRST-TIME/UNIQUE IN THE HISTORY OF THE EARTH

That is Complete and Utter Bullcrap.

There have been a series of mass extinctions over the 1/2 billion
years

The Ordovician period 443 million years ago

At the close of the Devonian period, 374 million years ago

The Great Dying at the end of the Permian period 251 million year ago
when 90%% of ocean life vanished, while "only" 70%% of the plants
animals and insects died

The Triassic boundary 201 million years ago

And the last Cretaceous (K/T) extintion which had been
PROVEN to have been caused by an impact at Chicxulub as 85%% of all
species died in the End-Cretaceous (K-T) extinction