> On Jul 19, 10:41�pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> Ok fellow philosophers i'm applying my mind to a few thoughts that
>> carry along many other questions; as we all understand to be the
>> situation: Many questions.

>

>> Firstly the energy: Sun, etc (the etc denotes a nod towards the
>> physics involved in the ability to perceive the sun, etc) (the last
>> etc is something i'm leaving aside)

>

>> Our "sun" irritated hubris grows towards it.

>

>> Yes.

>

>> Politically we sway "gently" back and forth towards it as we grow.

>

>> So for example the "left" side projects a need in order to sway that
>> way.
>> The "right" side projects its need to sway the other way.

>

>> All growing towards the energy.

>

>> Of course the words "left" and "right" are philosophical
>> simplifications of the actual relative positional relationships.

>

>> But we might imagine politics to philosophically be slight adjustments
>> in our presentation of the irritated hubris in relation to the
>> direction of the energy.

>

>> All very melodramatic but ultimately pretty simple stuff really when
>> you think about it.

>

>> There is no right or wrong. It's just the growth pulling and
>> irritating on the hubris towards the sun.

>

>> Our salesmanship is LITERALLY from the point of view(s) that aim
>> towards that "sun".

>

>> alt.*philosophy*.HThelps.

>

>> (i knocked up this post over a period of about 15 minutes upon a few
>> ideas running around in my head for while so it's kinda a poormans
>> presentation)

>
> The sun irradiates light and warmth for the masses.  Without it we'd
> be lost and forlorn.  It glows with the light of the true Son, Jesus
> Christ, the light of the world and salvation for the universe.  Heard
> any good music recently?
>
> C3