Re: Pleasure and pain in physical terms and panpsychism
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Re: Pleasure and pain in physical terms and panpsychism         


Author: feedbackdroid
Date: Apr 15, 2008 14:24

On Apr 15, 11:17 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" remove-techie.com> wrote:
> feedbackdroid wrote:
>> On Apr 14, 1:43 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>
>>> Read any dictionary for the definition of emergence. It will state that
>>> emergence occurs when a new property arises out of nowhere in complex
>>> systems whose constituent parts do not have this property. Something
>>> arising from nothing is magic, see? This is what most people including
>>> your self believe.
>
>> Ooof. Try reading the scientific literature on complexity theory,
>> instead of the dictionary.
>
> Why? This whole sub thread I started dealt with the commonly held idea
> of emergence. Definitions are by definition commonly held notions about
> a particular...
Show full article (2.53Kb)
22 Comments
Re: Pleasure and pain in physical terms and panpsychism         


Author: Mike E. Fullerton
Date: Apr 15, 2008 16:18

feedbackdroid wrote:
> On Apr 15, 11:17 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" > remove-techie.com> wrote:
>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>> On Apr 14, 1:43 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>> Read any dictionary for the definition of emergence. It will state that
>>>> emergence occurs when a new property arises out of nowhere in complex
>>>> systems whose constituent parts do not have this property. Something
>>>> arising from nothing is magic, see? This is what most people including
>>>> your self believe.
>>> Ooof. Try reading the scientific literature on complexity theory,
>>> instead of the dictionary.
>> Why? This whole sub thread I started dealt with the commonly held idea
>> of emergence. Definitions are by definition commonly held...
Show full article (3.29Kb)
no comments
Re: Pleasure and pain in physical terms and panpsychism         


Author: feedbackdroid
Date: Apr 15, 2008 19:35

On Apr 15, 5:18 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" remove-techie.com> wrote:
> feedbackdroid wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 11:17 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" >> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>>> On Apr 14, 1:43 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>>> Read any dictionary for the definition of emergence. It will state that
>>>>> emergence occurs when a new property arises out of nowhere in complex
>>>>> systems whose constituent parts do not have this property. Something
>>>>> arising from nothing is magic, see? This is what most people including
>>>>> your self believe.
>>>> Ooof. Try reading the scientific literature on complexity theory,
>>>> instead of the dictionary.
>>> Why? This whole sub thread I started dealt with the commonly held idea
>>> of emergence. Definitions are by definition commonly held notions about
>>> a particular thing.
>
>> Yes, better to alk about commonly held notions, rather than science. ...
Show full article (3.62Kb)
no comments
Re: Pleasure and pain in physical terms and panpsychism         


Author: Alpha
Date: Apr 16, 2008 06:43

On Apr 15, 4:18 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" remove-techie.com> wrote:
> feedbackdroid wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 11:17 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" >> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>>> On Apr 14, 1:43 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>>> Read any dictionary for the definition of emergence. It will state that
>>>>> emergence occurs when a new property arises out of nowhere in complex
>>>>> systems whose constituent parts do not have this property. Something
>>>>> arising from nothing is magic, see? This is what most people including
>>>>> your self believe.
>>>> Ooof. Try reading the scientific literature on complexity theory,
>>>> instead of the dictionary.
>>> Why? This whole sub thread I started dealt with the commonly held idea
>>> of emergence. Definitions are by definition commonly held notions about
>>> a particular thing.
>
>> Yes, better to alk about commonly held notions, rather than science. ...
Show full article (4.53Kb)
no comments
Re: Pleasure and pain in physical terms and panpsychism         


Author: Mike E. Fullerton
Date: Apr 16, 2008 10:09

feedbackdroid wrote:
> On Apr 15, 5:18 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" > remove-techie.com> wrote:
>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>> On Apr 15, 11:17 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 14, 1:43 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>>>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Read any dictionary for the definition of emergence. It will state that
>>>>>> emergence occurs when a new property arises out of nowhere in complex
>>>>>> systems whose constituent parts do not have this property. Something
>>>>>> arising from nothing is magic, see? This is what most people including
>>>>>> your self believe.
>>>>> Ooof. Try reading the scientific literature on complexity theory,
>>>>> instead of the dictionary.
>>>> Why? This whole sub thread I started dealt with the commonly held idea
>>>> of emergence. Definitions are by definition commonly held notions about
>>>> a particular thing.
>>> Yes, better to alk about commonly held notions, rather than science. ...
Show full article (1.62Kb)
no comments
Re: Pleasure and pain in physical terms and panpsychism         


Author: Mike E. Fullerton
Date: Apr 16, 2008 10:15

Alpha wrote:
> On Apr 15, 4:18 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" > remove-techie.com> wrote:
>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>> On Apr 15, 11:17 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 14, 1:43 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>>>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Read any dictionary for the definition of emergence. It will state that
>>>>>> emergence occurs when a new property arises out of nowhere in complex
>>>>>> systems whose constituent parts do not have this property. Something
>>>>>> arising from nothing is magic, see? This is what most people including
>>>>>> your self believe.
>>>>> Ooof. Try reading the scientific literature on complexity theory,
>>>>> instead of the dictionary.
>>>> Why? This whole sub thread I started dealt with the commonly held idea
>>>> of emergence. Definitions are by definition commonly held notions about
>>>> a particular thing.
>>> Yes, better to alk about commonly held notions, rather than science. ...
Show full article (5.59Kb)
no comments
Re: Pleasure and pain in physical terms and panpsychism         


Author: Alpha
Date: Apr 16, 2008 11:46

On Apr 16, 10:09 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" remove-techie.com> wrote:
> feedbackdroid wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 5:18 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>>> On Apr 15, 11:17 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 14, 1:43 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>>>>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Read any dictionary for the definition of emergence. It will state that
>>>>>>> emergence occurs when a new property arises out of nowhere in complex
>>>>>>> systems whose constituent parts do not have this property. Something
>>>>>>> arising from nothing is magic, see? This is what most people including
>>>>>>> your self believe.
>>>>>> Ooof. Try reading the scientific literature on complexity theory,
>>>>>> instead of the dictionary.
>>>>> Why? This whole sub thread I started dealt with the commonly held idea
>>>>> of emergence. Definitions are by definition commonly held notions about ...
Show full article (2.06Kb)
no comments
Re: Pleasure and pain in physical terms and panpsychism         


Author: Alpha
Date: Apr 16, 2008 11:56

On Apr 16, 10:15 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" remove-techie.com> wrote:
> Alpha wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 4:18 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>>> On Apr 15, 11:17 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 14, 1:43 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>>>>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Read any dictionary for the definition of emergence. It will state that
>>>>>>> emergence occurs when a new property arises out of nowhere in complex
>>>>>>> systems whose constituent parts do not have this property. Something
>>>>>>> arising from nothing is magic, see? This is what most people including
>>>>>>> your self believe.
>>>>>> Ooof. Try reading the scientific literature on complexity theory,
>>>>>> instead of the dictionary.
>>>>> Why? This whole sub thread I started dealt with the commonly held idea
>>>>> of emergence. Definitions are by definition commonly held notions about ...
Show full article (7.23Kb)
no comments
Re: Pleasure and pain in physical terms and panpsychism         


Author: feedbackdroid
Date: Apr 16, 2008 12:21

On Apr 16, 11:09 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" remove-techie.com> wrote:
> feedbackdroid wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 5:18 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>>> On Apr 15, 11:17 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>>> feedbackdroid wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 14, 1:43 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" >>>>>> remove-techie.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Read any dictionary for the definition of emergence. It will state that
>>>>>>> emergence occurs when a new property arises out of nowhere in complex
>>>>>>> systems whose constituent parts do not have this property. Something
>>>>>>> arising from nothing is magic, see? This is what most people including
>>>>>>> your self believe.
>>>>>> Ooof. Try reading the scientific literature on complexity theory,
>>>>>> instead of the dictionary.
>>>>> Why? This whole sub thread I started dealt with the commonly held idea
>>>>> of emergence. Definitions are by definition commonly held notions about ...
Show full article (2.06Kb)
no comments
Re: Pleasure and pain in physical terms and panpsychism         


Author: feedbackdroid
Date: Apr 16, 2008 12:31

On Apr 16, 12:56 pm, Alpha yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 10:15 am, "Mike E. Fullerton" >
>
>> So why is it you refuse to explain the "scientific" notion of emergence?
>> All notions of emergence require getting something from nothing.
>> Something arises that was not there before.
>
> While that part is true.
>

"something arises that was not there before" is hardly the same as
"getting something from nothing", as I've already explained to MEF 3
or 4 times already. But he hardly listens.

He should be recursively urged to actually read some scientific papers
on the subject of complexity theory.
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
War-Profiteering Hurts American Economy Both Short Term and Even More So Long Termsci.econ ·
1 2 3