> The Given
>
> The epistemological sceptic notes that our faculties of knowledge, in
> short reason and the senses, are fallible. Fallacious reasoning
> occurs, just as sensory illusions and hallucinations occur. On account
> of this fallibility of our faculties of knowledge, the sceptic is
> disposed to conclude that through reliance on them nothing can be
> known with certainty. There are many ways in which attempts have been
> made to answer the epistemological sceptic. Sometimes, the sceptic's
> claims have been said to be incoherent in the sense that to be true,
> or even to make sense at all, they require assumptions which make them
> false. Alternatively, the claims have been said to be unintelligible
> in the sense that facts about the nature of language and its use
> preclude them. Also, the sceptic's arguments themselves have been
> challenged on the score of invalidity - it is denied that they succeed
> in showing what they purport to show. More and more today, it has been
> maintained that the sceptic is misdirected about the nature of
> existence and of knowledge.
> ...

> On Sep 18, 1:33 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>> The Given

>

>> The epistemological sceptic notes that our faculties of knowledge, in
>> short reason and the senses, are fallible. Fallacious reasoning
>> occurs, just as sensory illusions and hallucinations occur. On account
>> of this fallibility of our faculties of knowledge, the sceptic is
>> disposed to conclude that through reliance on them nothing can be
>> known with certainty. There are many ways in which attempts have been
>> made to answer the epistemological sceptic. Sometimes, the sceptic's
>> claims have been said to be incoherent in the sense that to be true,
>> or even to make sense at all, they require assumptions which make them ...

> On Sep 17, 11:50 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On Sep 18, 1:33 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>> The Given

>

>>> The epistemological sceptic notes that our faculties of knowledge, in
>>> short reason and the senses, are fallible. Fallacious reasoning
>>> occurs, just as sensory illusions and hallucinations occur. On account
>>> of this fallibility of our faculties of knowledge, the sceptic is
>>> disposed to conclude that through reliance on them nothing can be
>>> known with certainty. There are many ways in which attempts have been
>>> made to answer the epistemological sceptic. Sometimes, the sceptic's
>>> claims have been said to be incoherent in the sense that to be true,
>>> or even to make sense at all, they require assumptions which make them ...

> On Sep 18, 1:33 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> The Given

>

>> The epistemological sceptic notes that our faculties of knowledge, in
>> short reason and the senses, are fallible. Fallacious reasoning
>> occurs, just as sensory illusions and hallucinations occur. On account
>> of this fallibility of our faculties of knowledge, the sceptic is
>> disposed to conclude that through reliance on them nothing can be
>> known with certainty. There are many ways in which attempts have been
>> made to answer the epistemological sceptic. Sometimes, the sceptic's
>> claims have been said to be incoherent in the sense that to be true,
>> or even to make sense at all, they require assumptions which make them
>> false. Alternatively, the claims have been said to be unintelligible
>> in the sense that facts about the nature of language and its use ...

> On Sep 17, 10:50 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On Sep 18, 1:33 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>>> The Given

>

>>> The epistemological sceptic notes that our faculties of knowledge, in
>>> short reason and the senses, are fallible. Fallacious reasoning
>>> occurs, just as sensory illusions and hallucinations occur. On account
>>> of this fallibility of our faculties of knowledge, the sceptic is
>>> disposed to conclude that through reliance on them nothing can be
>>> known with certainty. There are many ways in which attempts have been
>>> made to answer the epistemological sceptic. Sometimes, the sceptic's
>>> claims have been said to be incoherent in the sense that to be true,
>>> or even to make sense at all, they require assumptions which make them ...

> On Sep 18, 1:54 am, Don Stockbauer hotmail.com> wrote:

>> On Sep 17, 11:50 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

> One of the tasks of sociocybernetics is to map, measure, harness, and
> find ways of intervening in the parallel network of social forces that
> primarily control human behavior. To link once more back...

> On Sep 17, 10:50 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:

>> On Sep 18, 1:33 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>>> The Given

>>

>>> The epistemological sceptic notes that our faculties of knowledge, in
>>> short reason and the senses, are fallible. Fallacious reasoning
>>> occurs, just as sensory illusions and hallucinations occur. On account
>>> of this fallibility of our faculties of knowledge, the sceptic is
>>> disposed to conclude that through reliance on them nothing can be
>>> known with certainty. There are many ways in which attempts have been
>>> made to answer the epistemological sceptic. Sometimes, the sceptic's
>>> claims have been said to be incoherent in the sense that to be true,
>>> or even to make sense at all, they require assumptions which make them ...

> On Sep 18, 2:12 am, extro...@hotmail.com wrote:

>> On Sep 17, 10:50 pm, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>>> On Sep 18, 1:33 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:

>>

>>>> The Given

>>

>>>> The epistemological sceptic notes that our faculties of knowledge, in
>>>> short reason and the senses, are fallible. Fallacious reasoning
>>>> occurs, just as sensory illusions and hallucinations occur. On
>>>> account
>>>> of this fallibility of our faculties of knowledge, the sceptic is
>>>> disposed to conclude that through reliance on them nothing can be
>>>> known with certainty. There are many ways in which attempts have been ...

> The Given
>
> The epistemological sceptic notes that our faculties of knowledge, in
> short reason and the senses, are fallible. Fallacious reasoning
> occurs, just as sensory illusions and hallucinations occur. On account
> of this fallibility of our faculties of knowledge, the sceptic is
> disposed to conclude that through reliance on them nothing can be
> known with certainty. There are many ways in which attempts have been
> made to answer the epistemological sceptic. Sometimes, the sceptic's
> claims have been said to be incoherent in the sense that to be true,
> or even to make sense at all, they require assumptions which make them
> false. Alternatively, the claims have been said to be unintelligible
> in the sense that facts about the nature of language and its use
> preclude them. Also, the sceptic's arguments themselves have been
> challenged on the score of invalidity - it is denied that they succeed
> in showing what they purport to show. More and more today, it has been
> maintained that the sceptic is misdirected about the nature of
> existence and of knowledge.
> ...