| Re: Permissions to talk about 20 years ago |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Robert CohenRobert Cohen Date: Sep 6, 2008 21:11
On Sep 5, 9:47 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:> On Sep 5, 9:07 pm, Nic hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>> can I hav epermission to discuss somebody who really loved me and was
>> involved in the neuclear diarmament of Iran Iraq and who is now
>> (sadly ) dead ?
>
> It isn't necessary to ask consent to discuss what you want to
> discuss.
>
> Should you explicitly tie-in or relate the contents to philosophy,
> then that should be relevant to me & the others.
>
> In my opinion: Since you are anonymous, say what you truly think is
> reality, and try to explain the reasons why
> line is addressed to everybody, me included>
since the question is a put-on, let's facetiously pretend
10. i been un-slimed (isn't that the word, or what is that un-cutesy
pie word?)
9. that imitating a l'estranger, no speaka de englesh, is cosmopolitan
and plain good fun
8. wmd are hilarious when utilized
7. a friend that's dead is cool
6. alt.philosophy cares
5. milking a goat is no better than inbibing indigestible lactose
4 the republican party is sane and sensical
3. mexico's poverty does not much matter
2. the gov of alaska's e-mail order degree is in the flatness of
mother earth
1. if the dog is fed at the dinner table, it will luv ketchup, mayo,
mustard and barbecue sauce
| 
