Parts is parts?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Parts is parts?         


Author: ta
Date: Aug 14, 2008 10:53

Yesterday I stumbled upon three dogs while walking through my
neighborhood. The dogs were generally unruly -- barking incessantly,
pulling on their leashes, and snarling at other passer-by dogs.

Now I have interacted with each of these dogs individually on numerous
occasions, and have never witnessed this behavior. It was obvious that
the presence of each other created a "group chemistry" that did not
exist in isolation.

Humans, no doubt, are the same.

The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
5 Comments
Re: Parts is parts?         


Author: tg
Date: Aug 14, 2008 11:06

On Aug 14, 1:53 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
> Yesterday I stumbled upon three dogs while walking through my
> neighborhood. The dogs were generally unruly -- barking incessantly,
> pulling on their leashes, and snarling at other passer-by dogs.
>
> Now I have interacted with each of these dogs individually on numerous
> occasions, and have never witnessed this behavior. It was obvious that
> the presence of each other created a "group chemistry" that did not
> exist in isolation.
>
> Humans, no doubt, are the same.
>
> The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Or is it less?

-tg
no comments
Re: Parts is parts?         


Author: ta
Date: Aug 14, 2008 11:16

On Aug 14, 2:06 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Aug 14, 1:53 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Yesterday I stumbled upon three dogs while walking through my
>> neighborhood. The dogs were generally unruly -- barking incessantly,
>> pulling on their leashes, and snarling at other passer-by dogs.
>
>> Now I have interacted with each of these dogs individually on numerous
>> occasions, and have never witnessed this behavior. It was obvious that
>> the presence of each other created a "group chemistry" that did not
>> exist in isolation.
>
>> Humans, no doubt, are the same.
>
>> The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
>
> Or is it less?
>
> -tg
Show full article (0.70Kb)
no comments
Re: Parts is parts?         


Author: tg
Date: Aug 14, 2008 11:35

On Aug 14, 2:16 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2:06 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Aug 14, 1:53 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>> Yesterday I stumbled upon three dogs while walking through my
>>> neighborhood. The dogs were generally unruly -- barking incessantly,
>>> pulling on their leashes, and snarling at other passer-by dogs.
>
>>> Now I have interacted with each of these dogs individually on numerous
>>> occasions, and have never witnessed this behavior. It was obvious that
>>> the presence of each other created a "group chemistry" that did not
>>> exist in isolation.
>
>>> Humans, no doubt, are the same.
>
>>> The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
> ...
Show full article (1.21Kb)
no comments
Re: Parts is parts?         


Author: ta
Date: Aug 14, 2008 13:40

On Aug 14, 2:35 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2:16 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Aug 14, 2:06 pm, tg earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>> On Aug 14, 1:53 pm, ta nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Yesterday I stumbled upon three dogs while walking through my
>>>> neighborhood. The dogs were generally unruly -- barking incessantly,
>>>> pulling on their leashes, and snarling at other passer-by dogs.
>
>>>> Now I have interacted with each of these dogs individually on numerous
>>>> occasions, and have never witnessed this behavior. It was obvious that
>>>> the presence of each other created a "group chemistry" that did not
>>>> exist in isolation.
>
>>>> Humans, no doubt, are the same.
> ...
Show full article (1.68Kb)
no comments
Re: Parts is parts?         


Author: tooly
Date: Aug 14, 2008 14:09

"ta" nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:f0eabb05-84e4-42a1-9a62-d786a628a565@k7g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> Yesterday I stumbled upon three dogs while walking through my
> neighborhood. The dogs were generally unruly -- barking incessantly,
> pulling on their leashes, and snarling at other passer-by dogs.
>
> Now I have interacted with each of these dogs individually on numerous
> occasions, and have never witnessed this behavior. It was obvious that
> the presence of each other created a "group chemistry" that did not
> exist in isolation.
>
> Humans, no doubt, are the same.
>
> The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

This is treated in Truman Capote's 'In Cold Blood' where individuals come
together to create group identity, often quite different from the
individuals themselves. 2 movies have been made of the book...
Show full article (2.08Kb)
no comments