Re: Overheard on a train (of thought)
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Overheard on a train (of thought)         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: zinnic
Date: Mar 6, 2008 05:19

On Mar 5, 7:20 pm, Ed earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 1:03 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Mar 5, 9:58 am, zinnic gate.net> wrote:
>
>>> Overheard on a train of thought.
>
>>> I am a philosophical Zombie because I do not possess, and have never
>>> possessed, phenomenal consciousness.
>
>>> Question-How could a Zombie make that statement in the absence of a
>>> public truth condition for the occurence of phenomenal consciousnes?
>>> Zinnic
>
>> Because it is possible that the concept/awareness of phenomenal
>> consciousnes, is itself just a sequence of changing configurations,
>> making the real you equal to a zombie and sufficient for such
>> experiences?
>
>
>> A man is standing next to a tree in the swamp when quite suddenly the
>> tree is struck by lightning.  Much to the man's dismay, he is reduced
>> to his base elements and is dispersed throughout the swamp.  However,
>> completely by random chance, a most improbable event occurs - the
>> molecules of the now disintegrated tree reintegrate into the exact
>> molecular structure of the man who was standing next to it the instant
>> before he was destroyed.  What we are left with now is Swamp Man - an
>> exact duplicate of our original(except for the obvious fact that he is
>> composed of completely different "stuff"). Would Swamp Man "be" our
>> original man?  Would such a creature have thoughts? Language?  Is he
>> even human?
>
> What makes this story bizarre is the time factor.  Swampman is created
> in an instant.  But consider a small change; in this story our man
> takes up residence under the tree, is not hit by lightning and, over
> several years, every molecule of his body is replaced by the stuff he
> ingests under the tree.  He is now composed of different stuff than he
> was when he arrived.  In this scenario the questions asked above seem
> trivial, of course he's the same man, that's what happens to all of
> us.
>
> The question then becomes, if we are changed quickly are we less human
> than if we are changed gradually?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Another question. Why does'nt the 'present man' exist in an agony of
grief over the irretrievable loss of his 'past man'?
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!