|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: George HammondGeorge Hammond Date: Jul 27, 2007 23:13
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:50:02 -0700, "'foolsrushin.'"
hotmail.com> wrote:
>On 28 Jul, 03:51, "George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote:>> TO:
>> Professor Frank Tipler
>> Tulane University
>> Math Department
>> New Orleans
>>
>> FROM:
>> George Hammond M.S. Physics
>> Cape...
|
| Show full article (4.04Kb) |
|
| | 65 Comments |
|
|
Author: 'foolsrushin.''foolsrushin.' Date: Jul 28, 2007 00:29
On 28 Jul, 07:13, George Hammond notspam.net> wrote:> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:50:02 -0700, "'foolsrushin.'"
> hotmail.com> wrote:>>On 28 Jul, 03:51, "George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote:>>> TO:
>>> Professor Frank Tipler
>>> Tulane University
>>> Math Department
>>> New Orleans
>
>>> FROM:
>>> George Hammond M.S. Physics
>>> Cape Cod MA
>
>>> SUBJECT:
>>> Your 1994 book:
>>> _The Physics of Immortality_
>
>>> Dear Frank:
> ...
|
| Show full article (4.98Kb) |
|
| | 20 Comments |
|
|
Author: gnomegnome Date: Jul 28, 2007 00:33
On Jul 28, 8:13 am, George Hammond notspam.net> wrote:> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:50:02 -0700, "'foolsrushin.'"
>
>
>
> hotmail.com> wrote:>>On 28 Jul, 03:51, "George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote:>>> TO:
>>> Professor Frank Tipler
>>> Tulane University
>>> Math Department
>>> New Orleans
>
>>> FROM:
>>> George Hammond M.S. Physics
>>> Cape Cod MA
>
>>> SUBJECT:
>>> Your 1994 book:
>>> _The Physics of Immortality_ ...
|
| Show full article (4.33Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: 77ogrA77ogrA Date: Jul 28, 2007 01:06
On Jul 28, 2:29 am, "'foolsrushin.'" hotmail.com> wrote:> On 28 Jul, 07:13, George Hammond notspam.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:50:02 -0700, "'foolsrushin.'"
>> hotmail.com> wrote:>>>On 28 Jul, 03:51, "George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote:>>>> TO:
>>>> Professor Frank Tipler
>>>> Tulane University
>>>> Math Department
>>>> New Orleans
>
>>>> FROM:
>>>> George Hammond M.S. Physics
>>>> Cape Cod MA
>
>>>> SUBJECT:
>>>> Your 1994 book: ...
|
| Show full article (4.86Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: 'foolsrushin.''foolsrushin.' Date: Jul 28, 2007 02:09
On 28 Jul, 09:06, 77ogrA gmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 28, 2:29 am, "'foolsrushin.'" hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On 28 Jul, 07:13, George Hammond notspam.net> wrote:>
>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:50:02 -0700, "'foolsrushin.'"
>>> hotmail.com> wrote:>>>>On 28 Jul, 03:51, "George Hammond" notspam.org> wrote:>>>>> TO:
>>>>> Professor Frank Tipler
>>>>> Tulane University
>>>>> Math Department
>>>>> New Orleans
>
>>>>> FROM:
>>>>> George Hammond M.S. Physics ...
|
| Show full article (5.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: CRxxCRxx Date: Jul 28, 2007 02:30
"George Hammond"
> The POINT IS that the "afterlife" unlike a lucid dream
> is NOT generated by the neuronal brain, it's generated by
> the microtubule brain. THIS allows it to compute what the
> world would look like if you had a zero growth deficit (saw
> the world with zero curvature) which is "true reality" and
> has no time dilation or space magnification which is what
> makes life a veil of tears, a nightmare of suffering and
> evil to begin with.
This does sound worrysome. If you were a relative of mine, I'd wonder if
they could come without staight jackets. But perheps I simply do not
understand you.
What do you mean woth the "true reality" ?
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: CRxxCRxx Date: Jul 28, 2007 02:43
"'foolsrushin.'"
Suppose, now, that from the oldest to the
> earliest, the nearest to the farthest, cave paintings were almost
> thematically identical. You might be driven to wonder why!
It could be they were created by beings that were rather similar? And at the
time they could hardly make drawings of the Eiffel tower, for instance...
Just a thought!
Christine!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: 'foolsrushin.''foolsrushin.' Date: Jul 28, 2007 03:50
On 28 Jul, 10:30, "CRxx" wrote:
> "George Hammond"
>
>> The POINT IS that the "afterlife" unlike a lucid dream
>> is NOT generated by the neuronal brain, it's generated by
>> the microtubule brain. THIS allows it to compute what the
>> world would look like if you had a zero growth deficit (saw
>> the world with zero curvature) which is "true reality" and
>> has no time dilation or space magnification which is what
>> makes life a veil of tears, a nightmare of suffering and
>> evil to begin with.
>
> This does sound worrysome. If you were a relative of mine, I'd wonder if
> they could come without staight jackets. But perheps I simply do not
> understand you.
Yeah, I couldn't put up with it any longer: we never got a bite. 'Two
frauds talking at each other.' Michael Grey. Funny!
>
> What do you mean woth the "true reality" ?
>
>> Flat subjective spacetime...
|
| Show full article (1.96Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: 'foolsrushin.''foolsrushin.' Date: Jul 28, 2007 06:50
On 28 Jul, 10:43, "CRxx" wrote:
> "'foolsrushin.'"
> Suppose, now, that from the oldest to the
>> earliest, the nearest to the farthest, cave paintings were almost
>> thematically identical. You might be driven to wonder why!
> It could be they were created by beings that were rather similar? And at the
> time they could hardly make drawings of the Eiffel tower, for instance...
> Just a thought!
> Christine!
|
| Show full article (2.23Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: 'foolsrushin.''foolsrushin.' Date: Jul 28, 2007 07:09
On 28 Jul, 14:50, "'foolsrushin.'" hotmail.com> wrote:
On 28 Jul, 10:43, "CRxx" wrot
"'foolsrushin.'"
Suppose, now, that from the oldest to the
earliest, the nearest to the farthest, cave paintings were almost
thematically identical. You might be driven to wonder why!
It could be they were created by beings that were rather similar? And
at the
time they could hardly make drawings of the Eiffel tower, for
instance...
Just a thought!
Christine!
More likely they got the Eiffel tower from somewhere else! Sorry, that
is a bit extreme! Nevertheless,have a look at
rickstrassman.com/>. Again, <http://www.grahamhancock.com/>. Even
before you go to either, though, let me make one thing clear. Whilst I
beleive that Hancock and Strassman are onto something like an Eiffel
tower arrived at by lots of guys who never saw Paris, or at least
nothing they could have seen in the 'real' world, the crux of the
matter is that entoptic phenomena, for example, seem to be universal ...
|
| Show full article (2.34Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
