|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Sep 14, 2007 22:46
None of the GOP boys have a chance. Ron Paul has too many kooky ideas,
and all the rest will get tarred with Bush's Iraq war.
So- we could use a new national party anyway. Do you have anyone to
nominate for President? Is there some reason we cant have an
independent nomination process online?
|
| |
|
| | 27 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Sir FrederickSir Frederick Date: Sep 15, 2007 00:52
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:46:51 -0700, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:
>None of the GOP boys have a chance. Ron Paul has too many kooky ideas,
>and all the rest will get tarred with Bush's Iraq war.
>
>So- we could use a new national party anyway. Do you have anyone to
>nominate for President? Is there some reason we cant have an
>independent nomination process online?
The elite (royalty) would not like losing control and power.
Two parties cast enough illusion and the elite can
easily limit candidates to those they control.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Sep 15, 2007 03:00
On Sep 15, 3:52 am, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:46:51 -0700, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:
>>None of the GOP boys have a chance. Ron Paul has too many kooky ideas,
>>and all the rest will get tarred with Bush's Iraq war.
>
>>So- we could use a new national party anyway. Do you have anyone to
>>nominate for President? Is there some reason we cant have an
>>independent nomination process online?
>
> The elite (royalty) would not like losing control and power.
> Two parties cast enough illusion and the elite can
> easily limit candidates to those they control.
If they have the money. The price of oil is going up, the value of the
dollar down. They pay the troops to enforce their will with what may
be no more than nice lithographs of dead...
|
| Show full article (4.21Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: 9 Trillion Dollar Republican National Debt9 Trillion Dollar Republican National Debt Date: Sep 15, 2007 03:07
On Sep 15, 1:46 am, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:
> None of the GOP boys have a chance. Ron Paul has too many kooky ideas,
> and all the rest will get tarred with Bush's Iraq war.
= So- we could use a new national party anyway. Do you have anyone to
> nominate for President? Is there some reason we cant have an
= independent nomination process online?
Hillary will be just fine, Republicans as always are a lost cause,
Bush only won b/c he cheated and his daddy was Prez. Republicans are
toast.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: DareDare Date: Sep 15, 2007 06:06
On Sep 15, 3:52 am, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:46:51 -0700, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:
>>None of the GOP boys have a chance. Ron Paul has too many kooky ideas,
>>and all the rest will get tarred with Bush's Iraq war.
>
>>So- we could use a new national party anyway. Do you have anyone to
>>nominate for President? Is there some reason we cant have an
>>independent nomination process online?
>
> The elite (royalty) would not like losing control and power.
> Two parties cast enough illusion and the elite can
> easily limit candidates to those they control.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Igor The TerribleIgor The Terrible Date: Sep 15, 2007 06:13
On Sep 15, 6:07 am, 9 Trillion Dollar Republican National Debt
yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 1:46 am, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:
>
>> None of the GOP boys have a chance. Ron Paul has too many kooky ideas,
>> and all the rest will get tarred with Bush's Iraq war.
>
> = So- we could use a new national party anyway. Do you have anyone to> nominate for President? Is there some reason we cant have an
>
> = independent nomination process online?
>
> Hillary will be just fine, Republicans as always are a lost cause,
> Bush only won b/c he cheated and his daddy was Prez. Republicans are
> toast.
God god!! They sure got you where they want you. Think about what
you are saying...
Listen carefully, it doesn't make ANY difference whether is a dem or a
rep that slithers into office. They have been extracted from the same
sewer.
|
| Show full article (1.93Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Robert CohenRobert Cohen Date: Sep 15, 2007 06:38
On Sep 15, 9:06 am, Dare hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 3:52 am, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:46:51 -0700, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:
>>>None of the GOP boys have a chance. Ron Paul has too many kooky ideas,
>>>and all the rest will get tarred with Bush's Iraq war.
>
>>>So- we could use a new national party anyway. Do you have anyone to
>>>nominate for President? Is there some reason we cant have an
>>>independent nomination process online?
>
>> The elite (royalty) would not like losing control and power.
>> Two parties cast enough illusion and the elite can
>> easily limit candidates to those they control.
|
| Show full article (1.48Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Sep 15, 2007 08:32
Maybe Gore would be a spoiler -- he certainly hates the Clintons
enough -- but no smallparty wants Gore.
That's a pretty telling statement: too much of a jerk to be a
spoiler.
The media is certainly gush hyping nonsense, most recently that "Obama
is so handsome" over and over but the Clintons and the public ignore
the media gush hyping nonsense.
Only out of touch losers like Kerry pay attention to media nonsense.
It'll be Hillary by 15 points.
She'll get her mandate for nat'l health care.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Sep 15, 2007 08:38
The corp. media and the rest of the oligarchy associate the Clintons
with what they fear most: the internet.
They were lucky to get back to back idiots in '00 and '04 but that's
not going to happen again.
The media support Hillary only to the extent that, knowing she'll win,
they can hope to limit the damage.
They cannot but that doesn't mean they won't try.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: tgtg Date: Sep 15, 2007 08:45
On Sep 15, 1:46 am, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:
> None of the GOP boys have a chance. Ron Paul has too many kooky ideas,
> and all the rest will get tarred with Bush's Iraq war.
>
> So- we could use a new national party anyway. Do you have anyone to
> nominate for President? Is there some reason we cant have an
> independent nomination process online?
What, you object to having a matriarchy that will produce peace and
prosperity? You've been pushing that Bronze Age whore-priestess stuff
for years no
---are you afraid to try it for real?
-tg
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|