> "Fortunately, although we cannot argue directly from the unity of
> apperception to the unity of time (which would make the former a
> sufficient condition of the latter), we can make the reverse move from
> the *representation* of the unity of time to the unity of
> apperception, and by this means we can connect the transcendental
> synthesis of imagination with apperception and the categories. In
> order to do this, we need only combine the results of the first half
> of the Deduction with the doctrine that the unification or
> determination of time is produced by the transcendental synthesis of
> the imagination." (Allison [1986], 162.)
>
> I'm not so much interested in Allison's focus on the representation of
> the unity of time at the moment, as I am on the doctrine that the
> "unification or determination of time is produced by the
> transcendental synthesis of the imagination." This is the formal
> intuition (of time) mentioned by Kant in his famously obscure footnote
> at B162 n.
>
> Although in the Aesthetic Kant explored space and time as forms of ...