Re: On Folk Religion
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: On Folk Religion         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: tooly
Date: Sep 2, 2008 02:08

"Sir Frederick" fuzzysys.com> wrote in message
news:6hrlb4hugoboagrbbouka72455tggmhnng@4ax.com...
>
> On what the fantasy folk are up to with their
> anachronistic brain.
> On folk religion :
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_religion
> Folk religion consists of beliefs, superstitions and rituals transmitted
> from
> generation to generation in a specific culture. It could be contrasted
> with an
> organized religion or historical religion in which founders, creed,
> theology and
> ecclesiastical organizations are present. In contrast, ethnic religion
> refers to
> the religious practices particular to a certain ethnicity. Folk religion
> and
> ethnic religion alike are characterized by the absence of proselytization,
> membership being, as a rule, equivalent to ethnicity.
>
> The folk religion with the largest number of adherents is the Chinese folk
> religion, accounting for some 6%% of world population. Various "primal
> indigenous" religions (animism, shamanism) account for another 4%%, but
> elements
> of folk religion exist as part of all religious traditions and should be
> regarded as popular currents (as opposed to a theological or
> institutionalized)
> rather than as separate religions, so that folk religion, like
> superstition, is
> a phenomenon present in every society.
> More...
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_religion
> --
> Frederick Martin McNeill
> Poway, California, United States of America
> mmcneill@fuzzysys.com
> ******************************************
> "I never cease being dumbfounded by the unbelievable things people
> believe."
> - Leo Rosten
> ******************************************

Religion is also a medium by which a people can incorporate IDENTITY as a
matter of what they value, and how they see. It becomes symbolic to what
they ARE as a creature and rationale to create structures compatible to that
Identity. To tear down such totems out of hand is wrong [observe the Prime
Directive, sic]. It is even more wrong to construct cold hard sterile
monoliths of alienation, no matter the scientific sanctity, to replace of
the warmer HUMAN surroundings that religion allows. This is why I
differentiate between HUMAN and HOMO SAPIENS...for one is what it is, while
the latter is purely animal without redemption. You pretty much prove this
Sir...for they only sustainable virtue I can detect that you stand for and
espouse is curiosity; to KNOW. Knowledge without redeeming value leads only
to a jaded empty shell of nothingness [pretty much what you are finding we
are isn't it..."nothingness", under the name of firing neurons of course].
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!