Credibility is relative.
A boring humdrum person will believe virtually nothing incredulous.
A child will believe pretty well anything.
An imaginative intelligent person will believe quite a lot.
Fact is that the universe and existence are fantastically impossible and
incredulous - so you had better start believing this kind of thing now or
else you will be in for a large shock.
The Universe is not dull and plain and boring and credulous.
The Universe is fantastic, original, unpredictable, wonderful, incredulous,
impossible, diverse and the more you realize this - the more you see that
this is the way it is.
It is not boring or religious or plain or dull or humdrum.
If you cannot DEAL with what is incredulous - and cannot BELIEVE what is
incredulous.
You soon will!!!
THE BORG
"A Situation"
nothing.com> wrote in message
news:29kqc4lenl2fds45c48b2dtnapm3rl3jn3@4ax.com...
> On the ancient self quale that is known as a feeling
> of credibility.
>
> Early on, the evolving neural structures
> had to place some credence on their own modeling
> representations. Some say (Michael Gazzaniga) the early brain hence
> evolved
> a 'credibility module', to do this evaluating. The standard method was
> then implemented to communicate these evaluations of credibility
> to other brain parts : 'feelings', or in this case specifically : 'a
> feeling
> of credibility' , or not.
> According to my 'feelings', some posters here have no credibility
> at all.
> The very 'credibility' of what it is and means to be 'human', pervades
> my interests. Deceit, a core human method, is an effort to fool
> credibility.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility
> Credibility refers to the objective and subjective components of the
> believability of a source or message. Traditionally, credibility is
> composed of
> two primary dimensions: trustworthiness and expertise, which have both
> objective
> and subjective components. That is, trustworthiness is a receiver judgment
> based
> on subjective factors. Expertise can be similarly subjectively perceived
> but
> includes relatively objective characteristics of the source or message as
> well
> (e.g., source credentials or information quality). Some secondary
> dimensions
> include source dynamism (charisma) and physical attractiveness, for
> example.
>
> Credibility online has become an important topic since the mid-1990s, as
> the web
> has increasingly become an information resource. The Credibility and
> Digital
> Media Project @ UCSB highlights recent and ongoing work in this area,
> including
> recent consideration of digital media, youth, and credibility. In
> addition, the
> Persuasive Technology Lab at Stanford University has studied web
> credibility and
> proposed the principal components of online credibility and a general
> theory
> called Prominence-Interpretation Theory.
>
> According to the Society of Professional Journalists code of ethics,
> professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalists credibility.See
> Preamble
>
> "Street cred" is a contemporary neologism referring to credibility or
> acceptability among young or fashionable people, particularly those who
> support
> the hip-hop industry. [1] [2]
>
> More ...
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility
>
> --
> Frederick Martin McNeill
> Poway, California, United States of America
> mmcneill@
fuzzysys.com
> ******************************************
> "The institution of the family is decisive in determining not only if a
> person has the capacity to love another individual but in the larger
> social sense whether he is capable of loving his fellow men collectively.
> The whole of society rests on this foundation for stability, understanding
> and social peace."
> - Daniel Patrick Moynihan
> "Why is there something rather than nothing?"
> - Leibniz (1697 essay "On the Ultimate Origin of Things")
> ******************************************