On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 13:26:30 -0700, Wordsmith
rocketmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 2, 8:47 pm, Al Klein wrote:
>> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:40:10 -0700, Wordsmith
>>
>>
rocketmail.com> wrote:>>>On Nov 2, 7:11 am, parsifa...@
gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On 2 nov, 14:05, Sound of Trumpet
HotPOP.com> wrote:>>
>>
>>>>> Sex-related costumes infuriate mom [dress as a pregnant nun, or an
>>>>> excited priest this Halloween]
>>
>>>> Fellow "christian", J Young, would say that this is only humor.
>>>> Get a grip, repressed moron.
>>
>>>Would you accept, as "humor," a depiction of Mohammed submerged
>>>in a glass of urine?
>>
>> Stupid, yes. But humorous?
>
>To some, yes.
>
>>> If it's OK to do that to things sacred to Christians, then
>>>you must allow other religions to be mocked too.
>>
>> It's okay by me. As long as you don't mock any atheist beliefs.
>
>Most self-respecitng atheists, I'm guessing, would object to the
>term "atheist beliefs,"
Most atheists, especially those who have been reading my posts for
over a decade, would understand exactly what I said.
--
Al at Webdingers dot com
"Creationists are the best evidence we have that there is no intelligent design."
-Josef Balluch
