Re: O'Neill's conduct on Stargate, the movie
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Re: O'Neill's conduct on Stargate, the movie         


Author: monte
Date: Jul 5, 2008 15:05

On Jul 5, 11:40 am, Andrew Halliwell ponder.sky.com> wrote:
> In alt.tv.stargate-sg1 Anim8rFSK cox.net> wrote:
>
>>> Hey! We aren't that self centered, some days we screw other countries.
>
>>> Seriously, the countdown is on. Not too much longer before we
>>> get rid of the shrub!!! Don't blame _me_, _I_ didn't vote for
>>> him, _either_ time!!!
>
>> So you voted for a traitor instead, and you're PROUD of it? You're
>> really pathetic.
>
> If Bush isn't a traitor...
> Who is then? Who is this "traitor" he voted for instead?
> (Somehow, I think being convicted of treachery would ban one from becoming a
> presidential candidate)

I think he's refering to John Kerry. Apparently "swiftboating" is
acceptabull to him
4 Comments
Re: O'Neill's conduct on Stargate, the movie         


Author: Andrew Halliwell
Date: Jul 5, 2008 15:15

In alt.tv.stargate-sg1 monte <1000ojos@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If Bush isn't a traitor...
>> Who is then? Who is this "traitor" he voted for instead?
>> (Somehow, I think being convicted of treachery would ban one from becoming a
>> presidential candidate)
>
>
> I think he's refering to John Kerry. Apparently "swiftboating" is
> acceptabull to him

What did Kerry do that made him a "traitor"?
--
| |What to do if you find yourself stuck in a crack|
| spike1@freenet.co.uk |in the ground beneath a giant boulder, which you|
| |can't move, with no hope of rescue. |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc |Consider how lucky you are that life has been |
| in |good to you so far... |
| Computer Science | -The BOOK, Hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy.|
no comments
Re: O'Neill's conduct on Stargate, the movie         


Author: supermann
Date: Jul 5, 2008 15:34

(supermann flies down [*g*] and sadly surveys the discord among our
right-winged breathren.)

Well well...aren't we snippy!

It's the way it is with neo-cons. Hey i meant to ask about this
"ascension" gimmick....I am to understand that ALL of the Abbydossians
are "gone"? Ooh, that's convienient. Of all the plot readjustments
made to make the series more PC, that has to be a winner....get rid of
the physical evidence that ordinary fanboys would have to use to prove
my point that there's something wrong with the thinking behind the
movie.

Sure, make them all go away. On a related note, they smashed
Hitler's waxwork at Traussands, again.

So tell me....and I am only guessing here, since I didn't see the
episode....Did our "heroes" at SG-1 play any active role in these
peoples "relocation?"
no comments
Re: O'Neill's conduct on Stargate, the movie         


Author: Jette
Date: Jul 6, 2008 01:25

Andrew Halliwell wrote:
> In alt.tv.stargate-sg1 monte <1000ojos@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If Bush isn't a traitor...
>>> Who is then? Who is this "traitor" he voted for instead?
>>> (Somehow, I think being convicted of treachery would ban one from becoming a
>>> presidential candidate)
>>
>> I think he's refering to John Kerry. Apparently "swiftboating" is
>> acceptabull to him
>
> What did Kerry do that made him a "traitor"?

Stood against Bush?

--
Jette Goldie
jette@blueyonder.co.uk
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
http://wolfette.livejournal.com/
("reply to" is spamblocked - use the email addy in sig)
no comments
Re: O'Neill's conduct on Stargate, the movie         


Author: Andrew Halliwell
Date: Jul 6, 2008 01:30

In alt.tv.stargate-sg1 Jette scotlandmail.com> wrote:
> Andrew Halliwell wrote:
>> In alt.tv.stargate-sg1 monte <1000ojos@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> If Bush isn't a traitor...
>>>> Who is then? Who is this "traitor" he voted for instead?
>>>> (Somehow, I think being convicted of treachery would ban one from becoming a
>>>> presidential candidate)
>>>
>>> I think he's refering to John Kerry. Apparently "swiftboating" is
>>> acceptabull to him
>>
>> What did Kerry do that made him a "traitor"?
>
> Stood against Bush?
Show full article (0.98Kb)
no comments